New research from Avalere suggests that moving Part B drugs into Part D could result in higher out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) unless policy changes are made to reduce Part D cost sharing.
Medicare covers biologic therapies, including biosimilars, that treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) under either Part B or Part D depending on whether the drugs are physician-administered or self-administered, respectively. Under its blueprint to lower drug prices for American patients, the Trump administration has signaled an interest in consolidating coverage for these drugs under Part D as a way to facilitate negotiation of discounts for these products.
However, new research from Avalere suggests that moving Part B drugs into Part D could result in higher out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries with RA unless policy changes are made to reduce Part D cost sharing.
Avalere reached this conclusion after analyzing prescription drug event data and Part B claims for 2016 in a cohort of 250,000 Medicare beneficiaries who had claims for drugs including adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, and other RA therapies. They found that, after accounting for patients’ supplementary coverage or low-income subsidies, average annual out-of-pocket costs for Part B-covered drugs was $1380, versus $1990 for Part D-covered drugs.
This divergence in out-of-pocket spending stems from the fact that Part B beneficiaries generally pay 20% coinsurance for physician-administered therapies, and supplemental plans available to Part B beneficiaries can help to cover deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments. However, Part D, which covers self-administered drugs, does not allow for supplemental plans. According to Avalere’s analysis, Part D plans subject all covered RA drugs to coinsurance, typically in the range of 25% to 33%.
“Without benefit design changes, shifting [RA] drugs from Part B into Part D may lead to higher out-of-pocket costs for many Medicare patients,” said Matt Brow, president of Avalere. “The impact on individuals may vary based on the medication they take or the Part D plan they choose.”
Avalere also found that Part D plans only cover RA therapies without utilization-management strategies—like step therapy—only 6% of the time, while Part B drugs are not currently subject to such utilization management. However, recent CMS policy changes will allow Medicare Advantage plans, which cover approximately 32% of beneficiaries, to use step therapy for both Part B and Part D drugs as of 2019, despite vigorous opposition from groups such as the American College of Rheumatology and the Arthritis Foundation.
“The proposal to move drugs from Part B into Part D may subject more patients to utilization management for [RA] medications,” said Richard Kane, senior director at Avalere. “As a result, beneficiaries may find it more difficult to access care.”
Funding for Avalere’s research was provided by The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.