While it is well understood that timely access to treatment is key for the management of rheumatic diseases, respondents to The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Rheumatic Disease Patient Survey reported difficulty accessing and paying for their therapies in the past year.
While it is well understood that timely access to treatment is key for the management of rheumatic diseases, respondents to The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Rheumatic Disease Patient Survey reported difficulty accessing and paying for their therapies in the past year.
The survey, which was conducted online in June of 2019 among a nationally representative sample of 1517 adults with rheumatic disease, sheds additional light on findings from last year’s 2018 Rheumatic Disease Report Card, which graded individual US states on patients’ ability to live well with rheumatic disease.
One key finding of this year’s survey is that step therapy is being widely employed as a utilization management tool. Step therapy is a strategy under which which less expensive drugs must be administered and found to be ineffective before a patient gains access to higher-cost drugs, often including biologics and their biosimilars. In total, 46.49% of patients said they had been required to undergo step therapy in the past year. Patients in Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania were more likely to be subject to step therapy than those who lived elsewhere, and approximately half of all men receiving treatment were required to undergo step therapy.
These findings concerning step therapy are particularly notable given that, starting this year, CMS implemented a change allowing Medicare Advantage plans to use step therapy for Part B drugs. According to the ACR in a statement issued earlier this year, “Step therapy has resulted in forced drug switching, treatment gaps, and cessation of effective therapy.” Downstream effects, the group added, include uncontrolled disease, disability, and increased healthcare costs.
The cost of care was indeed a key issue for respondents in this year’s survey; 57.13% of patients said they had difficulty affording their therapy in the past year. Affordability concerns were not limited to the uninsured; while 90.16% of patients were insured, 56.98% of patients with insurance said they had difficulty affording their treatments. In total, 25.10% of patients reported that their out-of-pocket spending was higher than $1000, and 6.24% said their spending exceeded $5000 each year. Among those who had insurance, 23.76% paid more than $1000 out of pocket for their medication every year.
Additionally, 57.41% of patients said they were being seen by or had been referred to a rheumatologist, but 63.68% had to wait more than 30 days to receive an initial appointment, and 39.58% had to wait between 31 days and 60 days.
“These findings make clear that Americans living with rheumatic disease—regardless of age, gender, or income level—struggle to find affordable care," said Paula Marchetta, MD, MBA, president of the ACR. “To address these challenges, it is crucial for patients, clinicians, and policymakers to work together to improve access to rheumatology care so that patients can live longer, healthier, and more fulfilling lives.”
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Stable Patient Satisfaction Found After Switching From the Humira or Biosimilar CT-P17
December 14th 2024A real-world study in France found patient satisfaction was stable after switching from either the reference product or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar to the adalimumab biosimilar CT-P17, a high-concentration, citrate-free formulation.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.