The industry group for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) launched a public relations blitz in the wake of scrutiny regarding their role in prescription drug prices.
The industry group for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) launched a public relations blitz in the wake of scrutiny regarding their role in prescription drug prices.
The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) created a print and digital ad campaign called "Protect the Savings," which claims that if a proposal from HHS is finalized, pharmaceutical firms will reap the benefits while taxpayers’ costs rise, as will Medicare drug premiums.
In January, HHS announced a plan to exclude rebates from safe harbor protections that currently shelter drug makers’ rebates from penalties under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, and said it intends to create new safe harbor for discounts offered to patients, as well as fixed-fee service arrangements between drug makers and PBMs.
And this week, rebates were a prime topic at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on drug pricing, where 7 drug company executives testified about the high prices of their products. Some executives laid the blame for pricing issues with PBMs.
The ads released this week from PCMS defend the rebates as a way of saving money through negotiations with payers, and, using pictures of worried-looking Medicare beneficiaries, say that Part D premiums could rise 25%. America’s Health Insurance Plans, the lobbying group representing insurers, also has said that without PBM-payer contracts, drug prices would be even higher.
"We agree that drug company list prices must be addressed, and that more can be done to increase access and affordability. Unfortunately, this new proposal will not lead to lower prescription drug prices, but could have severe unintended consequences such as destabilizing the Medicare Part D program at a significant cost to taxpayers," said JC Scott, PCMA president and chief executive officer, in a statement. "We should focus on solutions that protect the important role of negotiations and the savings that are critical to keeping down consumer costs, including premiums."
HHS says that the new rule will counteract incentives behind higher list prices; currently, when a list price rises, patients who pay a percentage or all of the list price for a drug see their out-of-pocket expenses increase while PBMs reap financial rewards. According to HHS, rebates that today equal 26% to 30% of a drugs’ list price may be passed directly to patients and reflected in what individuals pay at the pharmacy counter.
While those with commercial insurance will likely need to wait for Congress to act to block rebates from their plans, individuals covered under federal plans like Medicare could see substantial changes to their costs; HHS estimates that one-fourth of Part D plans require coinsurance for preferred drugs, and nearly all use coinsurance for nonpreferred drugs. Furthermore, lower list prices and upfront discounts will translate into savings during the deductible, coinsurance, and coverage gap phases of the benefit.
PCMA, on the other hand, says the proposal will cost taxpayers $196 billion.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.