A representative from Pfizer confirmed to The Center for Biosimilars® that the company has terminated 5 of its preclinical biosimilar programs after the results of the company’s annual investment review.
A representative from Pfizer confirmed to The Center for Biosimilars® that the company has terminated 5 of its preclinical biosimilar programs after the results of the company’s annual investment review.
The Pfizer representative said that the move is an effort to shift the company’s investment focus to deliver on the areas of “greatest potential for patients and investors,” and to reallocate the funding from the biosimilar programs in question to late-stage program across other key areas of research for the company. According to the representative, “This will support our ability to better allocate resources to cutting edge late-stage programs in disease areas where patients have only a few or no treatment options.”
In part, he indicated, the renewed focus on the company’s late-stage assets is due to the fact that the biosimilars would not have been available to patients “for at least 4 to 8 years.” However, he emphasized that Pfizer remains committed to biosimilars, with 3 US-marketed biosimilars—infliximab (Inflectra), epoetin alfa (Retacrit), and filgrastim (Nivestym)—and another 5 biosimilars in mid- to late-stage development.
In fact, during last week’s 37th Annual J. P. Morgan Healthcare conference, Pfizer’s president of worldwide research and development, Mikael Dolsten, MD, PhD, discussed Pfizer’s outlook for the coming years and said that, in 2019, a 4-product “biosimilar bundle” had a “potential registration opportunity” with blockbuster potential.
The biosimilar products that Pfizer continues to develop are PF-05280014, a trastuzumab biosimilar referencing Herceptin that was the subject of an FDA Complete Response Letter citing a need for additional technical information in April 2018; PF-05280586, a rituximab biosimilar referencing Rituxan; PF-06410293, an adalimumab biosimilar referencing Humira that was the subject of a recent settlement with Humira-maker AbbVie that will delay US market access for the biosimilar until 2023; PF-06439535, a bevacizumab biosimilar referencing Avastin that recently gained a positive opinion from the European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use; and PF-06881894, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar referencing Neulasta.
Pfizer’s cuts to its biosimilars program mirror similar changes in drug makers’ priorities in recent months; in late 2018, Momenta dropped 5 of its biosimilar programs, on which it was collaborating with Mylan. The company kept 2 late-stage programs—an adalimumab biosimilar and an aflibercept biosimilar—and Craig A. Wheeler, chief executive officer of Momenta, said in a presentation that the company expected to use the sales proceeds from the products to fund expensive phase 3 trials for novel rare disease drugs.
Also in late 2018, Merck terminated its agreement with Samsung Bioepis for a tentatively approved follow-on insulin glargine product referencing Lantus, citing challenges in bringing the product to market in the United States.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Biosimilar Teriparatide Matches Forteo in Safety and Fracture Risk
January 23rd 2025Biosimilar teriparatide has been shown to be as safe and effective as its reference product for osteoporosis treatment, potentially enabling significant cost savings in Japan’s health care system while addressing persistent misconceptions about biosimilar quality.