Celltrion Healthcare’s candidate bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to Avastin (reference bevacizumab), in a phase 3 clinical trial in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Celltrion Healthcare’s candidate bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to Avastin, the European Union (EU) reference product, in a phase 3 clinical trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC).
Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). It inhibits VEGF from binding to cell surface receptors to limit tumor vascularization and tumor growth. Bevacizumab is approved in the United States and EU for treating metastatic NSCLC, in combination with chemotherapy.
Several bevacizumab biosimilars are available on the US and EU markets, and CT-P16 has demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to the reference product. The current study is an ongoing randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III trial conducted across 164 study sites in 21 countries. The authors have published data for the first part of the study, which includes data up to 1 year of follow-up for the last patient enrolled, and said that full data for the entire study period will be published after the study is completed.
Patients (n = 689) with stage 4 or recurrent nsNSCLC were randomized to receive the bevacizumab biosimilar candidate CT-P16 or EU reference product combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles as induction therapy. Patients with controlled disease after induction therapy then continued maintenance therapy with the same drug. A total of 499 patients completed the induction period, and 466 (n = 239 in the CT-P16 group; n = 227 in the originator group) entered the maintenance therapy period.
Computed tomography scans to evaluate response to therapy were conducted multiple times throughout treatment. According to the authors, the baseline characteristics, medical history, and previous treatments between the two groups were “well balanced.”
Equivalent Objective Response Rate in CT-P16 and EU Reference Product Groups
The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), based on best overall response, according to RECIST criteria version 1.1 during the induction period. Secondary endpoints included response duration, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
The primary efficacy endpoint (ORR) was 42.40% (95% CI, 37.16-47.64) in the biosimilar group and 42.07% (95% CI, 36.88-47.27) in the reference product group. The 95% confidence intervals were within the predefined equivalence margins.
The authors said the approximately 42% ORR in both treatment groups was “comparable” to historical clinical trial data on reference bevacizumab with paclitaxel and carboplatin. They added that a similar proportion of patients in each group achieved a complete response (CR; 0.6% in the biosimilar group and 0.9% in the originator group) or partial response (PR; 41.8% and 41.2%, respectively).
Among secondary endpoints, response duration in patients achieving a CR or PR was similar between groups, 7.2 months for CT-P16 (95% CI, 6.3-8.2) and 6.3 months for the reference product (95% CI, 5.8-7.5). Median TTP, PFS, and OS were also similar between groups, according to the authors.
Safety and Immunogenicity
The authors noted final safety data will be available following completion of the study, which is still ongoing. Up to the data cut-off date (1 year of follow-up for the last patient enrolled), most patients experienced 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 96.2% of patients in the biosimilar group; 93% in the reference product group). 51.6% of patients in the biosimilar group and 50.6% of patients in the reference product group experienced TEAEs considered to be related to the use of bevacizumab. Most TEAEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity, and the most common were alopecia (63.8% of patients in the biosimilar group; 63.4% in the reference product group) and anemia (31.6% and 27.0%, respectively).
Three deaths were considered related to the study drug in the biosimilar group, 1 each from pulmonary hemorrhage, sepsis, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Seven deaths were considered related to the study drug in the EU reference product group, 2 from pulmonary hemorrhage and 1 each from cardiac arrest, cerebral infarction, lung abscess, septic shock, and sudden death.
The most common TEAE of special interest was hypertension, occurring in 12.8% of patients in the biosimilar group and 11.3% in the reference product group. Most were of grade 2-3 in severity.
Regarding immunogenicity, 22.6% and 24.1% of patients were positive for antidrug antibodies at any time during the study in the biosimilar and reference product groups. The authors said the proportion of patients positive for neutralizing antibodies was “low and similar between treatment groups” (2.3% in the CT-P16 group; 2.3% in the reference product group).
The authors concluded that CT-P16 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity to the reference product in patients with nsNSCLC after 1 year of follow-up. They added their results also suggest comparable survival outcomes, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity. As the study is ongoing, they said, “full data for secondary endpoints due to be assessed during the whole study period, as well as longer-term safety data, will become available upon study completion.”
Reference
Verschraegen C, Andric Z, Moiseenko F, et al. Candidate bevacizumab biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. BioDrugs. 2022;36(6):749-760. doi:10.1007/s40259-022-00552-8
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.