Posters from the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting showed the safety and efficacy of a trastuzumab biosimilar and a denosumab biosimilar in different types of cancer.
Posters from the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting showed the safety and efficacy of a trastuzumab biosimilar and a denosumab biosimilar in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and bone metastases, respectively.
Real-World Data on Trastuzumab Biosimilar
Data from a Brazilian, national, multicenter, observational, prospective real-world study analyzed the use of Zedora, known as Ogivri (trastuzumab-dkst) in the United States and was the first oncology biosimilar approved in Brazil.
The investigators enrolled 126 or 170 of patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who received at least 1 dose of a the biosimilar as adjuvant therapy and presented preliminary data on 42. The safety of the biosimilar was determined by the occurrence of adverse events as reported by the patients.
The median age of the 42 patients was 48.5 years and 78.6% of them had a node-negative disease. Most patients had tumors that were positive for hormone-receptors, 71.4% had estrogen-receptor-positive disease and 57.1% had progesterone-receptor-positive disease. A majority of patients (59.5%) underwent conservative surgery and 40.5% underwent a mastectomy.
Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most frequent histological breast cancer subtype, accounting for 97.6% of cases. Overall, 25.0% of the patients received solely a trastuzumab biosimilar and 68.8% received combination therapy with the biosimilar and pertuzumab. Also, 6.3% received the reference product in neoadjuvant therapy.
At least 1 adverse event was reported by 59.5% of patients, of which 2 events were considered serious. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events accounted for 35.7% of the reported events and no deaths occurred. The researchers said that the nature and severity of adverse events was consistent with the known safety profile of the reference product.
Phase 3 Denosumab Biosimilar Study
Investigators conducted a phase 3 trial assessing the safety and efficacy of a QL1206, the first denosumab biosimilar, compared to the reference product (Prolia) in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases.
For inclusion, the patients had to be between the 18 and 80 years old and have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status between 0 and 2. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous administration of the biosimilar or the reference product and were followed for 53 weeks.
In total, 717 patients were included and 357 received the biosimilar while 360 received the originator. The median percentage changes at week 13 were -75.2% urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTX/uCr) for the biosimilar and -75.8% for the originator. The number of treatment-emergency adverse events between the biosimilar and originator groups was similar (n = 332/356 vs 348/361, respectively). The proportions of positive anti-drug antibody, neutralizing antibody, and pharmacokinetic characteristics was also comparable between the groups.
Reference
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.