Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: Let me get back to that question, though, about how much variance you see in prescribing behaviors and doctors favoring, if we use that example, one taxane over another taxane in the treatment of a breast cancer patient.
Brandon Shank, PharmD, MPH, BCOP: I think Marcus was alluding to it. It depends on what the insurance coverage is. For our physicians, they would usually use the reference product. But sometimes if there’s insurance approval…
Bruce A. Feinberg, DO: And how is that communicated to the physician? Is that your job? You’re supposed to be able to tell them, “You can’t give that to this patient.”
Brandon Shank, PharmD, MPH, BCOP: The state board of pharmacies are also implementing changes and legislation to help support that. And the communication to the physicians varies depending on what that is. But it would be if there was a substitute. We haven’t encountered that situation yet, except in outpatient coverage where the physician was notified of the substitution the biosimilar. If the physician wanted the necessary brand, they could also indicate that on an outpatient prescription order. At an institutional level, I don’t think they have the same control. It goes to the therapeutics committee, which would be chaired by a physician that would approve that. I’m not aware of any automatic substitutions, and I don’t see that right now in the landscape because of the interchangeability and variant data. And the physicians would want to interpret that and be able to use that before automatic substitutions were made. That may change in the future with the Purple Book or through more formal guidance.
Hope S. Rugo, MD: Are you talking specifically about therapeutics, there? And chemotherapy and more biosimilars? I just wanted to be clear about where you wouldn’t see the automatic substitution, because we do have relatively automatic substitution for the filgrastim product. But we don’t have anything. Of course, there aren’t any therapeutic biosimilars, so we don’t really have to address the question right now.
Brandon Shank, PharmD, MPH, BCOP: Now, it would just be supportive care with the growth factor. And I think that would be made at an institutional level. Currently, we give, at my institution, the branded Neupogen product. But a biosimilar, at other institutions, may get approved through a therapeutic committee.
Hope S. Rugo, MD: Right, which we have. Yes.
Brandon Shank, PharmD, MPH, BCOP: For chemotherapy—actually, we should say “biotherapy”—it would be a whole different game. We’ll see how pharmacy and therapeutics committees dictate that at their institutions.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.