Patients may save money on prescriptions---and cut down pharma's profits.
The long awaited news conference from then President-Elect Trump in early January didn't disappoint in terms of drama, nor bode well for the country's most well-known and financially-lucrative pharmaceutical companies.
Only Merck remained unscathed among the top-tier drug manufacturers in the Dow--stock was up 2.6%. Merck was the Dow's best performer in the sector, due to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) acceptance of a bid for an accelerated review of an immune-system drug to be used with chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer patients.
Today via NPR, Mr. Trump inferred that many drugs are manufactured outside the US, and that , "A lot of industries are going to be coming back. We have to get our drug industry coming back. Our drug industry has been disastrous. They’re leaving left and right. They supply our drugs, but they don't make them here. To a large extent. And the other thing we have to do is create a new bidding procedures for the drug industry because they're getting away with murder."
"Pharma has a lot of lobbies, a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power. And there's very little bidding on drugs. We’re the largest buyer of drugs in the world, and yet we don't bid properly. And were going to start bidding and were going to save billions of dollars over a period of time", stated Trump.
Does this mean Medicare will negotiate drug prices in the future?
With more people entering the Medicare system over the next eight years, this will be more than just a radical shift in a federal program that is already financially burdened beyond its capacity. Medicare is the largest buyer of drugs in the US, and that means all private insurance companies that participate in the Medicare marketplace will be able to negotiate prices with the drug companies. Estimates are the federal government could save as much as $16 billion annually by negotiating prices directly--which is way below the $300 billion figure mentioned by Trump when he was a candidate.
All pharmaceutical stakeholders will be impacted -- but can Medicare give a price ultimatum that drug companies must take? We don't know yet. Trump has said that pharmaceutical organizations have a responsibility to the public, even though they are privately-owned entities. The end result will hopefully be a compromise.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.