Trade representatives for Canada and Mexico met last week over the ratification and implementation of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and press reports say that the Trump administration is considering acceding to Democrats’ demands to reduce patent protections for reference biologics in order to get the pact through Congress.
Trade representatives for Canada and Mexico met last week over the ratification and implementation of the United States—Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), and press reports say that the Trump administration is considering acceding to Democrats’ demands to reduce patent protections for reference biologics in order to get the pact through Congress.
The USMCA was signed by the 3 countries on November 30, 2018, ostensibly as a replacement for the original North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), just weeks after Democrats took control of the House of Representatives.
The biosimilars industry has been working since earlier this year to convince legislators to join them in opposing a pharmaceutical intellectual property provision in the USMCA. Currently, the provision would give 10 years of marketing exclusivity for biologic drugs.
Under US law, the period of exclusivity is 12 years; Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives want the time reduced to fewer than 10 years, possibly to 8 years.
Canada’s current exclusivity period for biologics is 8 and Mexico’s is 5, meaning that US biosimilar exports would have to wait longer if the additional timeframe in the USMCA passes.
The Association for Accessible Medicines has said that the USCMA will hinder generic and biosimilar competition, particularly as the manufacturing process for biosimilars becomes more efficient.
Mexico’s trade negotiator, Jesús Seade, spoke optimistically about the possibility of a deal on Twitter after the meeting with Canada, and was also said to have met with the US trade representative.
In the United States, the regulatory exclusivity provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) already provide for a longer exclusivity period than required by the USMCA; the BPCIA provides 4 years of data exclusivity and 12 years of marketing exclusivity for reference biologic products
Representative Jim Himes, D-Connecticut, told The Wall Street Journal this week that a deal before Christmas is possible. But Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said that if a deal is not reached this week, he does not see how a 2019 ratification is possible.
Innovator biotechnology firms and pharmaceutical industry groups, such as the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, known as BIO, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, known as PhRMA, approve of the intellectual property language currently in the agreement.
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.