During the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, researchers published new findings on the use of rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as well as the outcomes of patients who relapse early after treatment with rituximab for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
During the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, researchers published new findings on the use of rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as well as the outcomes of patients who relapse early after treatment with rituximab for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Rituximab is not currently approved—but is sometimes used off-label—for maintenance therapy in MCL, but this use is not well studied. A systematic review and meta-analysis, published in an abstract, evaluated the outcomes of patients given rituximab maintenance versus patients not given rituximab maintenance, with outcomes of interest including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).1
The researchers assessed 7 studies (including a total of 1050 patients). Three of the studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 were observational studies with comparative arms. Across tstudies, 455 patients received rituximab maintenance and 595 did not.
Overall, rituximab maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50) and OS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83), and these results persisted when assessing only patients treated after autologous stem cell transplantation for both PFS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.47) and OS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.65).
When restricting the analysis to prospective RCTs, rituximab maintenance improved PFS (HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65) but not OS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.08). Only 2 of the 3 RCTs reported OS, however.
Another study on rituximab discussed the biologic’s use in DLBCL, a disease that has a relapse rate of approximately 40%.2 The study’s authors compared the clinical features and outcomes of patients from the Singapore lymphoma study database who experienced early relapse (within 2 years), late relapse (after 2 years), and continuous complete remission (no relapse after 5 years) following treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy received between 1992 and 2017.
Of 472 total patients, 135 had early relapse, 42 had late relapse, and 295 had continuous complete remission. In the 2 relapse groups, median survival was 1.4 years (range, 1.16-1.83), and 9.86 years (range, 6.86-13.31).
The researchers found that 98% of patients with residual disease at the end of treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy had an early relapse, and the odds of early relapse versus late relapse was higher in patients with high levels of lactate dehydrogenase, more than 1 extranodal site of disease, and stage III or stage IV disease (though age over 60 years or central nervous system involvement were not associated with early relapse).
The researchers say that, even in the era of rituximab, patients with early relapse have worse outcomes, and clinical factors predict these poor outcomes.
References
1. Hilal T, Wang Z, Almader-Douglas D, et al. Rituximab maintenance for mantle cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; Abstract e19557).
2. Koh JJ, Lim ST, Sultana R, et al. Predictors of early vs late diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapses in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; Abstract e19553).
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
The Top 5 Most-Read Conference Articles of 2024
December 26th 2024The top 5 biosimilar conference articles in 2024 highlight significant progress in the biosimilar landscape, including strategies for market sustainability, safety of switching to biosimilars, and substantial savings through high biosimilar adoption, while also addressing ongoing challenges.