When treating any disease, adherence is key. Specifically, however, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), adhering to biologic therapy is critical in the management of these diseases, as previous research has demonstrated that a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 0.86 significantly increases the risk of disease flare.
When treating any disease, adherence is key. Specifically, however, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), adhering to biologic therapy is critical in the management of these diseases, as previous research has demonstrated that a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 0.86 significantly increases the risk of disease flare.
To further explore the risk factors in non-adherence, researchers presenting their findings at the American College of Gastroenterology’s annual meeting conducted a retrospective study1 to evaluate patients treated at a tertiary care IBD center prescribed a biologic therapy (either adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, or ustekinumab). To be included in the study patients had to have filled 3 prescription claims with the center’s specialty pharmacy.
MPR was calculated as the days’ supply for all prescription claims divided by the total number of days that had elapsed during the study period. Non-adherence to medication was defined as MPR less than 0.86.
In total, the researchers enrolled 560 patients (393 patients with Crohn disease [CD] and 67 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) in the retrospective analysis. The overall mean MPR was 0.89. Researchers found that 71% of patients with CD and 87% of patients with UC were adherent. However, the study was able to identify several risk factors that increase the risk of non-adherence in a univariate analysis including a diagnosis of CD, insurance type, psychiatric history, smoking, prior biologic use, and narcotic use.
In patients with CD, as the number of risk factors present increased, the probability of non-adherence significantly increased. The study authors identified that adherence was 77% and 73% in patients with 0-1 risk factors, decreasing to 65%, 61%, and 37% in patients with 2, 3, or 4 risk factors, respectively (P <.05).
Another study2 presented at the meeting sought to identify treatment outcomes of patients with IBD with early disease control. In order to evaluate biologic treatment outcomes in early CD and UC, researchers conducted a systematic literature review.
In total, 19 studies in CD (6 clinical and 13 observational), 3 in UC and 1 in both CD and UC (all observational) were included in the review. Studies evaluated the effectiveness of infliximab (CD: 15 papers, UC: 4 papers), adalimumab (CD: 9 papers, UC: 3 papers) and certolizumab pegol (CD: 4 papers) as mono- or combination biologic therapy with conventional therapy.
The study authors reported that risk factors for disease progression were noted at baseline only in select studies. Outcomes were assessed at >54 weeks in 10 (50%) of CD studies and 3 (75%) UC studies.
The researchers recommended that there needs to be a more thorough consideration of patients’ baseline risk of disease progression and assessment of long-term outcomes in order to more effectively evaluate early biologic use in achieving disease control.
For future studies, the authors also noted that the measures of these outcomes should also be consistent to support comparisons among the interventions.
References
1. Haydek J, Shah N, Slaughter J, et al. risk factors for medication non-adherence to biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective analysis. Presented at the 83rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, October 5-10, 2018; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Abstract 570. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41395-018-0296-0.pdf.
2. Jairath V, Wright D, Calleja A, et al. Assessment of biologic treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients with ‘early disease’: results of a systematic literature review.Presented at the 83rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, October 5-10, 2018; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Abstract 584. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41395-018-0296-0.pdf.
The Growing Impact of Biosimilars in IBD Care
April 23rd 2025Biosimilars are proving to be a game-changing solution in the fight against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering a cost-effective alternative to biologics with similar efficacy and safety, while innovative drug delivery systems promise to further enhance treatment outcomes and accessibility for millions worldwide.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Biosimilar and Biologic Use Increasing in Greek Patients With IBD
April 19th 2025A retrospective study from a single inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Greece reported that from 2018 to 2022, the use of biologics increased by 28% yearly, and the proportion of patients using biosimilars grew from 33% to 67%.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup: March 2025
April 1st 2025As the biosimilar industry celebrates a decade of growth, the market continues to evolve with expanded treatment options, cost savings, and a flurry of new competitors—yet regulatory challenges, market dynamics, and patient accessibility remain key hurdles to unlocking its full potential.