In surveys conducted in February and March 2020, rheumatologists cited low adoption rates of biosimilars by payers and unfavorable discounts as major reasons why they feel uncomfortable switching prescribing patterns from reference products to biosimilars.
Rheumatologists have reservations about prescribing biosimilars and want to see more payer support, savings benefits, and evidence of interchangeability, according to data presented in the inaugural issue of Rheumatology Insights, a research-based report published by Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions.
“The results of our study show that rheumatologists are remarkably similar to other providers in their views on biosimilars. That is, despite an overwhelming familiarity and comfort level, the majority are reluctant to use biosimilar products,” said Gordon Lam, MD, medical director of clinical and translational research at NorthEast Rheumatology for Atrium Health in Charlotte, North Carolina, in the report.
Of the rheumatologists included in the analysis, 45% said that they are comfortable with the FDA approval process for biosimilars but still have concerns regarding interchangeability and extrapolation for other indications without clinical trial evidence. Another 45% said they are comfortable with the FDA approval process for biosimilars.
Additionally, 10% of rheumatologists feel that the FDA is rushing biosimilars through the approval process without requiring enough safety and efficacy data.
With regard to familiarity with biosimilars, 53% of rheumatologists described themselves as very familiar with biosimilars, and 45% said they are somewhat familiar with them.
Cost Savings Disputes
Cost savings was cited as a moderately to extremely important issue for 90% of physicians when considering a biosimilar treatment. An additional 76% said that favorable economics of biosimilars for their practice was moderately to extremely important to them.
The report also noted that 92% of the rheumatologists surveyed agreed that the current economics of biosimilars are not favorable enough to motivate them to switch from reference products.
“These concerns are valid. Real-world evidence (RWE) of the cost-effectiveness of biosimilars in the United States is scant, and presently, most biosimilars are priced at only 15% to 40% below the reference product list price,” said Lam.
Biosimilar prices are expected to decrease as more products enter the market, just as they did in the generics market.
In a related presentation at the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2020 Virtual Conference, Michael Kolodziej, MD, vice president and chief innovation officer for ADVI Health, concluded that the generics market has demonstrated that significant discounts can be achieved, but “it takes a while to get to that discount.”
Top Concerns for Rheumatologists
Rheumatologists said their top biosimilar prescribing concerns were efficacy (38%), evaluating when to prescribe a biosimilar versus a reference product (21%), lack of economic benefit (21%), and lack of payer adoption (13%).
Overall, 66% of physicians stated that they would be unlikely to switch patients from a reference product to a biosimilar until there is greater adoption among payers.
That may not happen until there is a threshold level of RWE for payers to digest, Lam said.
“Uncertainty and lack of payer adoption may limit utilization and hence impede accumulation of RWE, but RWE is often needed to alleviate uncertainty and increase payer adoption,” he said.
Similar research was presented last year at the American College of Rheumatology’s annual meeting. Investigators found that although US rheumatologists have growing awareness of biosimilars, they still are reluctant to switch stable patients to biosimilars or to extrapolate use of biosimilars to indications not on the label for those products.
Empowering Vulnerable Populations: The Path to Equitable Biologic Therapy Access
December 22nd 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, senior vice president and system chief pharmacy officer at Providence, discusses strategies to improve equitable access to biologic therapies, including tiered formularies, income-based cost sharing, patient assistance programs, and fostering payer partnerships.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Stable Patient Satisfaction Found After Switching From the Humira or Biosimilar CT-P17
December 14th 2024A real-world study in France found patient satisfaction was stable after switching from either the reference product or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar to the adalimumab biosimilar CT-P17, a high-concentration, citrate-free formulation.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.