This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
This week, drug maker Sanofi filed a patent infringement suit against Mylan in a New Jersey district court. Sanofi’s suit alleges that Mylan has infringed on 18 patents for its originator insulin glargine, Lantus.
The suit was triggered by Mylan’s filing of a New Drug Application (NDA) with the FDA for a pre-filled pen and a drug vial presentation of a follow-on insulin glargine (in the United States, insulins are regulated as drugs and not as biologics; hence, drug makers must submit NDAs rather than biologics license applications for follow-ons of originator products). According to Sanofi, the Mylan NDA included a challenge to all of Sanofi’s patents listed for Lantus in the FDA’s orange book.
Mylan’s filing of an NDA for its proposed insulin glargine follows the recent release of data demonstrating comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity with Lantus, as well as the follow-on’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence with the reference drug. Mylan, working together with India-based partner Biocon, is also seeking European approval for its product; in September, Biocon received a certificate of compliance from the European Union for its manufacturing facility in Malaysia where it plans to produce the insulin. Approval of the facility was welcome news for Biocon; high operational costs related to the Malaysian facility had been partially responsible for a 51% drop in Biocon’s second-quarter net profits, despite the company’s strong sales of insulins.
Sanofi faces challenges from other drug developers who seek a share of the Lantus market; in July, the FDA granted Merck’s follow-on insulin glargine a tentative approval, but will not provide the drug with a final approval until patent litigation, brought by Sanofi, has concluded. Sanofi’s suit triggered an automatic stay of 30 months.
Already on the US market is Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) Basaglar, the first FDA-approved insulin glargine follow-on, which launched in 2016 after a lengthy patent litigation with Sanofi. Competition from Basaglar led to steep declines in insulin market share for Sanofi in the second quarter of 2017; Sanofi’s US sales of Lantus and Toujeo (a second insulin glargine) dropped by 23.9%. CEO Oliver Brandicourt has alerted investors that the company’s fortunes were unlikely to change in the remainder of 2017, and warned that the company could see accelerated declines in sales of its insulins as it faced further competition.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.