As part of its investigation into drug pricing, the Senate Finance Committee is launching a bipartisan probe into insulin prices, while a Democratic congressman from Vermont announced a bill to allow the importation of insulin from Canada and other countries.
As part of its investigation into drug pricing, the Senate Finance Committee is launching a bipartisan probe into insulin prices.
In addition, a Democratic congressman from Vermont, Peter Welch, unveiled a bill to allow the importation of insulin from Canada and other countries.
On Friday, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, sent 3 letters to the heads of insulin manufacturers Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi seeking information regarding recent price increases of up to 500% or more.
Sanofi’s chief executive officer, Olivier Brandicourt, is already scheduled to testify Tuesday before the committee as part of its probe into drug pricing, which started last month. According to 1 report, Brandicourt is looking to lay the blame for high prices at the feet of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and the impact that rebates have on what patients wind up paying.
In the letters, Grassley and Wyden seek detailed information about 30 different points related to drug pricing, research and development costs, rebate agreements, PBM pacts, patient assistance programs, donations to patient advocacy groups, production and marketing and advertising, revenues and gross margins from selling insulin, and the companies’ funding of patient assistance programs. The companies have until March 8 to respond.
In a statement, the senators said that the price of Eli Lilly’s Humalog increased from $35 to $234 between 2001 and 2015, a 585% increase. The price of Novo Nordisk’s Novolog increased from $289 to $540 between 2013 and 2019, an approximately 87% increase. The price of Sanofi’s Lantus increased from $244 to $431 between 2013 and 2019, an approximately 77% increase.
The Senate Finance Committee oversees Medicare and Medicaid; the letter notes that in 2012, Medicare Part D spending for Lantus was $1.1 billion; by 2016, Part D spending was $1.7 billion. Medicaid spending swelled from $314 million to $785 million.
Last month, the finance committee held its first hearing on drug prices, and as part of that session it heard from a mother who talked about her son rationing his insulin because of the $1700 monthly cost.
Rationing is common among patients with diabetes, said an endocrinologist who appeared with Welch last week when he introduced his bill at a news conference. Welch’s bill would allow patients to import insulin from Canada and other countries. The FDA and HHS have not endorsed that option, given concerns with quality control, counterfeits, and other issues.
In January, Grassley and Senator Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, also introduced a bill that would allow imports from Canada.
The rise in insulin prices was the main factor in the increase in healthcare spending over 4 years for poeple with type 1 diabetes, a report from the Health Care Cost Institute said last month.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.