Earlier this month, US Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, sent a letter to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Joseph Simons urging the FTC to “examine whether makers of biologic medicines are using strategies like ‘pay-for-delay’ to hinder or delay biosimilars from entering the market.”
Earlier this month, US Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, sent a letter to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Joseph Simons urging the FTC to “examine whether makers of biologic medicines are using strategies like ‘pay-for-delay’ to hinder or delay biosimilars from entering the market.”
According to the letter, “Biologics play an important role in treating many serious illnesses and are among the fastest growing classes of therapeutic products… Without biosimilar competition, US patients and payers will likely see additional price increases on biologics in the years to come.”
The senators cite examples of alleged pay-for-delay strategies, specifically the settlement agreements that pharmaceutical company AbbVie has entered into with both Amgen and Samsung Bioepis over their adalimumab biosimilars, referenced on AbbVie’s originator product, Humira. The drug is the world’s top-selling prescription product, with annual sales of $16 billion.
Under each of the settlement agreements, Amgen and Samsung are unable to launch their biosimilars in the United States until 2023, but both products will be available for purchase on the European market as soon as the end of 2018.
“This means that while European patients will benefit from biosimilar competition later this year, Americans may be without access to Humira biosimilars for almost 5 more years. While such terms in patent settlement agreements may not always be inappropriate, the incentives for parties to delay biosimilar entry are present, and biologic markets could be susceptible to patent settlement abuse,” reads the letter.
Furthermore, this is not the first time that the FTC has been called on to investigate these very settlements. In April 2018, patient advocacy group Patients for Affordable Drugs (P4AD) also urged the FTC to examine the same agreement between AbbVie and Samsung.
“AbbVie is using pay-for-delay deals to keep a cheaper generic off the market and patients are the victims. We believe it is illegal and anti-competitive, and we are asking the FTC to step in and protect patients from AbbVie’s price hikes,” said the president and co-founder of P4AD, David Mitchell, in a statement.
Conversely, AbbVie has strongly opposed using the term “pay-for-delay” to describe the agreements. In a prior statement, the company said “AbbVie’s settlements with Amgen and Samsung Bioepis are in no way pay-for-delay arrangements. AbbVie is not paying Amgen or Samsung Bioepis, and in fact both Amgen and Samsung Bioepis will be paying royalties to AbbVie once their adalimumab biosimilar products launch in the [United States].”
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Skinny Labeling
January 2nd 2025To close out the year, 4 senators came together to introduce a new bipartisan bill to protect biosimilar and generic drug manufacturers from patent litigation when obtaining “skinny label” approvals for their products.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Top 5 Most-Read Regulatory Articles of 2024
December 25th 2024In 2024, significant biosimilar approvals were granted by the American and European regulatory agencies, including the first interchangeability designations for biosimilars referencing ustekinumab, adalimumab, denosumab, and aflibercept, marking key regulatory milestones in improving patient access to cost-effective treatments.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.