Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, BCMAS, DPLA, the vice president of Biosimilars at Cardinal Health, discussed the many ways that pharmacists and interchangeability designations can affect biosimilar utilization.
In an interview with AJMC.com, the website of The American Journal of Managed Care®, and the sister site of The Center for Biosimilars®, Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, BCMAS, DPLA, vice president of Biosimilars at Cardinal Health, discussed the role that pharmacists can play in promoting biosimilar uptake and the first interchangeable biosimilar.
Sonia T. Oskouei, PharmD, BCMAS, DPLA
Oskouei said that pharmacists can aid biosimilar uptake by leading education efforts for providers and other members of the health care team. Pharmacists are also able to monitor the pipeline of anticipated biosimilars to help providers prepare and they have the added bonus of having a comprehensive understanding of the managed care landscape, which can help pharmacists identify viable opportunities or biosimilar utilization.
She delved into the potential for interchangeable biosimilars and the meaning behind interchangeability designations. Oskouei predicted correctly that the United States would see its first interchangeable biosimilar, which was approved in July 2021 (Semglee; insulin aspart). She said that the most important aspect of interchangeability designations is that they are relevant primarily for biosimilars that are dispensed in retail pharmacy or specialty pharmacy settings.
Oskouei also talked about how the full implications of interchangeable biosimilars is unknown, especially for insulin products, where there is strong pricing debates and a really high demand for affordable diabetes medications for US patients. She mentioned that the designation could serve as an extra stamp of approval to alleviate potential clinical concerns among providers and patients.
In regard to how providers and pharmacists approach biosimilars differently, Oskouei discussed how pharmacists face challenges with conducting payer coverage assessments and inventory management implications stemming from varying payer policies in addition to the clinical concerns providers face.
Oskouei mentioned therapeutic interchanges as a mechanism to give pharmacists more power over biosimilar exchanges, saying that they allow for pharmacists to authorize exchanges of therapeutic alternatives in accordance with approved policies or protocols within a formulary system without requiring an interchangeable designation or provider permission.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.