Bevacizumab is employed cautiously in patients with multifocal glioblastomas rather than single glioblastomas because of a fear, based on unconfirmed preclinical data, that bevacizumab can increase the invasive tumor phenotype.
Glioblastoma has a highly infiltrative growth pattern that increases in later disease stages. Tumor cells infiltrate the brain, proliferate, and form tumor nodules at multiple locations. Glioblastoma cells secrete vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), which induces the formation of a dysfunctional vascular system in the tumor.
Treatment with bevacizumab (Avastin or a biosimilar), which targets VEGF-A, inhibits neovascularization, and initially leads to increased tumor profusion due to improved oxygenation of the tumor tissue. However, ongoing treatment with bevacizumab leads to regression of tumor vasculature. In clinical practice, however, bevacizumab is employed cautiously in patients with multifocal glioblastomas rather than single glioblastomas because of a fear, based on unconfirmed preclinical data, that bevacizumab can increase the invasive tumor phenotype.
In order to clarify whether bevacizumab should be applied to patients with multifocal glioblastomas, the authors of a recent study, published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, performed a retrospective data analysis of patients with glioblastomas who were treated at University Hospital Frankfurt between April 2008 and March 2016.
All patients (n = 164) with multifocal glioblastomas were compared to a matched control cohort with single glioblastomas; all patients received bevacizumab in the relapse situation. The investigators compared response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and relapse between the groups.
In patients with multifocal glioblastoma, a partial response (PR) was observed as best response 11 patients, stable disease (SD) in 2 patients, mixed response (MR) in 1 patient, and progressive disease (PD) in 2 patients. In the single glioblastoma cohort, PR was observed as best response in 9 patients, SD in 3 patients, MR response in 1 patient, and PD in 3 patients. No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between the 2 groups. However, there was a trend for shorter OS in the multifocal glioblastoma group. Median PFS was 21 weeks for patients with multifocal glioblastoma, and 23.5 weeks for their matched controls. Median OS was 33 weeks in the multifocal glioblastoma group, and 43.5 weeks in the control group.
To examine whether bevacizumab led to a more infiltrative tumor phenotype, the investigators explored the share of new lesions on the patients’ last magnetic resonance imaging showing progression before the start of bevacizumab and at progression under bevacizumab therapy in both groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the frequency of new lesions.
The researchers conclude that bevacizumab should be given to patients with multifocal glioblastoma where no reasonable therapy alternative exists. “These patients often are in a critical condition and further clinical deterioration would make many patients considerably dependent on caregivers. Delaying this deterioration is of high concern both to the patients and their caregivers, even if no prolongation of survival can be achieved,” say the authors.
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.