Biologics are increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but real-world data quantifying the costs of these therapies have been lacking. A new study, published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, sought to determine trends in costs and relative market share of IBD therapies in the United States over the past 9 years.
Biologics are increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but real-world data quantifying the costs of these therapies have been lacking. A new study, published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, sought to determine trends in costs and relative market share of IBD therapies in the United States over the past 9 years.
Drawing from de-identified outpatient, inpatient, and pharmaceutical claims for approximately 40 million to 50 million patients in the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database for the years 2007 to 2015, the researchers included patients with IBD diagnoses and at least 1 pharmaceutical claim during the study period.
The study cohort comprised 415,405 patients; 188,842 patients had Crohn’s disease (CD), 195,183 patients had ulcerative colitis (UC), and 31,380 patients had indeterminate colitis (ID). During the 9-year period, among patients with CD:
In patients with UC:
Patients who used corticosteroids only remained largely stable in both populations (CD: 16.9% versus 16.6%; UC: 18.8% versus 16.2%).
Utilization trends show a consistent rise in biologics’ market share; from 2007 to 2015, use of biologic therapies increased from 13.7% to 30.1%. A pediatric subgroup analysis showed an even sharper rise in biologics use, from 19.1% in 2007 to 45.9% in 2015.
The cost of biologic therapy also rose over the study period; in 2007, the average patient taking biologic therapy accounted for $25,275 in per-member per-year costs (a value comprising the costs paid by a patient's health plan plus the patients’ copay and deductible amounts). In 2015, that amount rose to $36,051. Pediatric patients’ costs grew even more, from an average $23,616 to $41,109. These cost trends for biologics “greatly exceed” the cost trends for other drugs that treat IBD, including immunomodulators, 5-ASAs, or corticosteroids.
“From a clinician perspective, corticosteroid-sparing therapy plans are evidence-based and necessary to optimize long-term health outcomes, maximize quality of life, and minimize opportunity loss,” the authors write. However, the increases in cost associated with biologic therapies are only expected to continue for US patients with IBD. “The findings from our study further reiterate the ongoing need to develop patient-centered, cost-effective pharmacotherapy strategies by judiciously incorporating biologics in individualized therapy plans.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.