A retrospective study of New England patients receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone.
A retrospective study of 1156 patients in New England receiving trastuzumab or bevacizumab found that combining dose rounding and biosimilar use resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone as rising costs have spurred cost-saving initiatives.
The authors of the study said that costs associated with cancer care have been growing rapidly and are estimated to keep increasing. The rise in costs has led many centers to utilize dose rounding—rounding to the nearest vial size when the difference is 10% or less—as a cost-saving and drug waste reduction strategy. However, according to the authors, no previous studies have estimated the cost savings associated with dose rounding and biosimilar utilization combined.
The retrospective study of electronic health records included patients from 2 large health systems in New England who received trastuzumab or bevacizumab, monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, between 2015 and 2020. The specific molecules were chosen because biosimilars referencing both were available on the formularies of both health systems. A total of 1156 patients and 15,145 doses of trastuzumab or bevacizumab were included, and the most common indications for treatment were breast and gynecological malignancies. The investigators estimated costs based on Medicare drug pricing and compared cost per dose in 4 groups: dose rounding/biosimilar use; dose rounding only, biosimilar use only, and neither.
Most (75%) of the patients received reference products that were not dose rounded, 12% received dose rounded reference products, 8% received biosimilars that were not dose rounded, and 5% received dose rounded biosimilars. There were some differences in baseline characteristics between groups, such as a higher percentage of patients with metastatic disease and a larger average dosing weight in the dose-rounding/biosimilar group compared to other groups.
Compared to neither dose rounding nor biosimilar use, dose rounding/biosimilar use was estimated to save $331 per dose for trastuzumab (95% CI, 356 to –30) and $497 per dose for bevacizumab, (95% CLs, –512.73 to −481.06). Dose rounding only was not estimated to reduce costs compared to neither dose rounding nor biosimilar use. Biosimilar use only was estimated to reduce costs by $261 and $366 per dose of trastuzumab and bevacizumab compared to a reference product that was not dose rounded.
The authors concluded that dose-rounding and biosimilar use combined resulted in greater cost savings than either strategy alone, saying that combining the 2 strategies “should be considered for global adaptation as standard to circumvent rising costs” without compromising care.
Reference
Abdelmeseh V, Brown BR, Huynh JP, Zullo AR. Comparative cost savings of biosimilar and dose rounding utilization in oncology care. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023;29(6):1437-1442. doi:10.1177/10781552221134257
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.