There is low insulin availability in the Philippines and investigators recommend policy and regulatory reviews.
Investigators reporting on insulin availability in the Philippines said affordability and access are inadequate for many in the Southeast Asia country and recommended measures for improvement, including:
Authors of the study, presented at 2021 ISPOR Virtual, said “insulins were affordable in the public sector, but access was affected by low availability.” Private-sector patients faced higher costs compounded by limited competition. Policy and regulatory reviews to improve insulin availability would help, investigators said.
Insulin pricing, availability, and affordability were reviewed in 6 regions of the Philippines following the imposition of a January 2019 value-added tax exemption policy. Insulin prices were compared with international reference prices (IRPs) and affordability was based on the number of days’ wages needed for the “lowest-paid unskilled government worker” to purchase a monthly supply of insulin (10 mL, 100 IU/mL).
The public sector was defined as public hospitals and medicine outlets; and the private sector, private hospitals and retail pharmacies. Mean availability of insulin originator products and biosimilars was 2.8% and 50.0%, respectively, in the public sector and 63.9% and 61.1% in the private sector.
LPG metaformin was the only insulin that met the World Health Organization target of 80% availability in both sectors, and originator versions of most insulins and biosimilars, along with analogue insulins, were not available in the public sector, except for human short-acting and analogue long-acting insulins (2.8% availability in both cases).
Sources of Insulin
All insulin products included in the study were imported, and 3 companies (Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Novo Nordisk) accounted for 65% of those products, authors wrote. Vials were the most common form of insulin available (55%), followed by prefilled pens (41.7%) and cartridges (3.2%). Vials were in general cheaper than pens and cartridges, and biosimilars were cheaper than originator products, according to findings.
Insulin in the private sector was 1.05 to 3.66 times more costly than IRPs; in the public sector, prices were uniformly less costly than the IRP. “Purchasing 10 mL of human and analogue insulin in the private sector would need 2 to 4 days’ and 4 to 8 days’ wages, respectively,” the authors wrote.
Although affordability was based on wages of the lowest-paid government workers, the authors noted that “a significant portion of the population earns less than the lowest-paid government worker.”
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.