The World Health Organization has long recognized the need for a global harmonization of standards for biologics worldwide. In response, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Biological Standards and Control has developed the first international standard for infliximab.
The World Health Organization has long recognized the need for a global harmonization of standards for biologics worldwide. In response, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) has developed the first international standard (IS) for infliximab, which targets tumor necrosis factor (TNF).
A recent paper describes how a candidate preparation coded 16/170 was found to be suitable as an IS for bioactivity for infliximab. The hope is that future continued studies such as these, examining standardization, will help promote biosimilar development, leading to lower drug costs worldwide, the authors said.
The issue has arisen because postapproval manufacturing changes in highly regulated markets can potentially result in changes in the product over time. Reference infliximab, for example, has gone through approximately 50 such changes since approval. As multiple biosimilars of a given reference product enter the marketplace, these individual products will all undergo their own changes, and could experience drift from the originator product.
Every product’s manufacturer has its own reference standards (a term not to be confused with reference product) against which it measures a product’s consistency over time. As such, there is an increasing need for harmonization of these in-house standards with a public standard that can serve as a benchmark for the reference product and all biosimilars.
The infliximab IS from NIBSC is intended to support in vitro bioassay calibration and validation by defining international units (IU) of bioactivity. The authors noted that the proposed units are not intended to revise product labelling or dosing requirements, since these decisions are made by regulators.
In this study, each ampule was assigned values of 500 IU of TNF neutralizing activity and 500 IU of binding activity. Two preparations of infliximab were formulated and lyophilized at NIBSC. The study involved using in vitro cell-based bioassays (TNF neutralization, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and complement-dependent cytotoxicity) and binding assays.
For TNF neutralization, between 74% and 83% of the assays performed were valid depending on the standard and the assay readout type. The assays proved to be very robust, even in the absence of a common standard. No one particular assay method was more variable; in addition, all reported potencies were similar.
The most variable assays in this study were the binding assays. Although this might be due to the smaller number of assays performed compared to the TNF neutralization assays, there could be several other contributing factors. Unlike TNF neutralization, the methods used were diverse and included ELISA, FRET and SPR platforms.
Overall, when infliximab products were assayed relative to in-house standards, there was significant variation in the relative potency estimates reported. However, the introduction of a common bioassay reference standard reduced inter-laboratory variability.
As more infliximab products come to market, they will all adopt their own lifecycle. It is important to ensure that the quality of products are aligned after different authorizations. Of note, this was the first international collaborative study, consisting of 26 participants in 15 countries.
Reference
Metcalfe C, Dougall T, Bird C, et al. The first World Health Organization international standard for infliximab products: A step towards maintaining harmonized biological activity. [published online November 5, 2018]. mAbs. doi:10.1080/19420862.2018.1532766.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.