The Psoriasis Stratification to Optimize Relevant Therapy (PSORT) study assessed real-world levels of self-reported non-adherence to traditional systemic and biologic therapies used for psoriasis, and evaluated psychological and biomedical factors associated with non-adherence using multivariable analyses.
Conventional systemic and biologic therapies are highly effective in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis; however, treatment effectiveness is much lower in routine clinical practice than in clinical trials. Medication non-adherence is a missed opportunity for therapeutic benefit. Although patients go to their doctors for assistance in treating their symptoms, according to the study, approximately half of medications are not taken as prescribed.
This study, Psoriasis Stratification to Optimize Relevant Therapy (PSORT), assessed real-world levels of self-reported non-adherence to traditional systemic and biologic therapies used for psoriasis, and evaluated psychological and biomedical factors associated with non-adherence using multivariable analyses. Researchers defined non-adherence as either being intentional, in which patients knowingly make the decision not to follow the prescribed medication regimen, or unintentional, such as forgetting to take the medication. Of the 811 patients included in the study, 617 self-administered systemic therapy, and 22.4% were classified as non-adherent (12% intentionally, 10.9% unintentionally).
In the traditional systemic treatment group, (35.3%; n = 286), methotrexate was the most common treatment product (52%; n = 141). In the biologic treatement group, (64.7%, n = 525) adalimumab was the most common prescribed biologic (52.5%, n= 258), followed by ustekinumab (32.6%; n = 160) and etanercept (14.9%; n = 73). A significant proportion of patients using self-administered oral conventional systemic or subcutaneous biologic therapies (etanercept, adalimumab) were classified as non-adherent (22.4%); 12% were classified as intentionally and 10.9% were classified as unintentionally non-adherent.
The study reports that the multivariable model showed that being on a conventional systemic (odds ratio [OR], 4.34; 95% CI, 2.38-7.91), having strong medication concerns (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-3.39), having a weaker routine or habit for taking systemic therapy (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97), a longer treatment duration (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) and a younger age (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), were associated with being classified as overall non-adherent.
The researchers concluded that a significant number of patients with psoriasis who were prescribed self-administered systemic therapies reported both intentional and unintentional non-adherence with their treatment regimen. This study emphasizes the need to assess adherence when determining factors that could be influencing treatment response, rather than the prescribed treatment simply being ineffective.
Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Reduced Efficacy vs Aflibercept in nAMD
April 3rd 2025The ranibizumab biosimilar Ongavia exhibited significantly less improvement in visual acuity and retinal thickness compared with aflibercept (Eylea) in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), highlighting a potential trade-off between economic savings and clinical efficacy.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup: March 2025
April 1st 2025As the biosimilar industry celebrates a decade of growth, the market continues to evolve with expanded treatment options, cost savings, and a flurry of new competitors—yet regulatory challenges, market dynamics, and patient accessibility remain key hurdles to unlocking its full potential.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
PBM Evolution Toward Value-Based Care Shifts to Transparent Pharmacy Pricing
March 30th 2025Josh Canavan, PharmD, RazorMetrics, and Chris O'Dell, Turquoise Health, predict pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) will evolve toward value-based care, mirroring the broader shift toward open-cost structures.
FDA Approves Another Pair of Denosumab Biosimilars, Conexxence and Bomyntra
March 27th 2025The FDA approved another set of denosumab biosimilars, Conexxence/Bomyntra (denosumab-bnht), expanding treatment options for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and other bone-related conditions, amidst a flurry of similar approvals and legal settlements.