“The common initiation in North America of infliximab as monotherapy is concerning, given the now substantial body of evidence…documenting the importance of concomitant [immunomodulators] in reducing the likelihood of secondary loss of responsiveness related to anti-infliximab antibodies," write the researchers.
The use of anti—tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, which are highly effective in treating pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), varies in different global territories. A recent initiative of the international Pediatric IBD Network (PIBDNet) explored regional differences in anti-TNF use in pediatric IBD in order to help understand regional differences and how those differences may impact a patient’s outcomes.
PIBDNet developed an electronic survey that was sent to all members who are physicians treating pediatric IBD, and responses were gathered from 344 providers in 43 countries (54% in North America, 29% in Europe, 6% in Oceania, 6% in Asia, 3% in Africa, and 2% in South America). The respondents each treated a median of 40 patients with IBD.
The survey explored practice patterns, including the percentage of patients who were given anti-TNF therapy, the percentage of the time that anti-TNF agents were used as the first line of therapy, how often a patient was given infliximab versus adalimumab, choice of immunomodulator, and other issues.
The researchers found that North American physicians used anti-TNF agents as first-line therapy 80% of the time in treating Crohn disease (CD), versus 38% of the time in Europe and 30% of the time in other territories. North Americans also used infliximab (though not adalimumab) in combination with an immunomodulator less often in both patients naïve to immunomodulation and in those who had failed prior treatment.
While physicians worldwide used similar adalimumab induction regimens and similar treatment intensification protocols, North Americans were also less likely (42%) than other physicians (90% in Europe and 100% elsewhere) to adhere strictly to standard infliximab induction protocols.
In treating ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-TNF drug use was also higher in North America, with a median of 20% of patients receiving anti-TNF agents in North America versus 10% in Europe and 5% elsewhere. Infliximab was the most used first anti-TNF agent in all areas. As in CD, physicians treating UC used the drug more frequently as a first-line therapy (76% of the time) than did physicians in Europe (47%) or elsewhere (36%).
Interestingly, more routine testing, such as testing for tuberculosis, before starting anti-TNF therapy was undertaken in Europe (95% of cases) versus North America (90% of cases) or elsewhere (83%). However, after starting therapy, more annual screening was performed in North America (39% of cases) than Europe (14% of cases) or elsewhere (16% of cases).
The researchers concluded that the use of anti-TNFs varies significantly in North America from the rest of the world.
“Our North American pediatric data are very different from adult surveys of the American Gastroenterological Association in 2009 and of gastroenterologists in Maryland and Washington, DC, in 2007, where 70% and 48% of respondents, respectively, said they would use [immunomodulators] prior to prescribing [infliximab],” wrote the authors.
They add that “The common initiation in North America of infliximab as monotherapy is concerning, given the now substantial body of evidence…documenting the importance of concomitant [immunomodulators] in reducing the likelihood of secondary loss of responsiveness related to anti-infliximab antibodies.”
Reference
Church PC, Hyams J, Ruemmele F, de Ridder L, Turner D, Griffiths AM. The continental divide: anti-TNF use in pediatric IBD is different in North America compared to other parts of the world. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:3190548. doi: 10.1155/2018/3190548.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for May 2024—Podcast Edition
June 2nd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review the biggest gastroenterology biosimilar stories from May 2024, covering new data from conferences and journals on infliximab and adalimumab products that demonstrate positive clinical results and confirm the safety of these biosimilars, as well as the feasibility of switching to them.
Phase 3 Study Reports Similar Efficacy Between SB17, Stelara in Psoriasis
October 19th 2024A phase 3, 28-week comparative clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis confirmed similarity of the proposed ustekinumab biosimilar SB17 (Samsung Bioepis) to the reference product (Stelara) in efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Pharmacokinetic Modeling Proposes Cost-Effective Dosing for Adalimumab, Etanercept Biosimilars
October 12th 2024A UK cohort study used drug concentration samples from rheumatoid arthritis patients starting the adalimumab biosimilar Amgevita and the etanercept biosimilar Benepali to simulate drug levels under standard and alternate dosing schedules, suggesting that personalized dosing could reduce costs while potentially increasing efficacy.