Low levels of competition among drug makers can lead to product shortages and increased generic drug prices, and a recently published study in Global Health suggests that mergers and acquisitions, which reduce the number of players in the pharmaceutical field, should be closely monitored by regulatory authorities.
Low levels of competition among drug makers can lead to product shortages and increased generic drug prices, and a recently published article in Global Health suggests that mergers and acquisitions, which reduce the number of players in the pharmaceutical field, should be closely monitored by regulatory authorities.
The study’s authors assessed data on completed merger and acquisition deals from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2016 in which a generic or biosimilar developer was taken over by an innovator developer. Data on mergers and acquisitions were derived from Bloomberg Finance L.P.
The final study sample consisted of 345 deals, totaling $160.30 billion in value (not adjusted for inflation). In 1995, the total value of such mergers was “negligible,” said the authors, but the value of these transactions grew sharply in 2015 and 2016, reaching an annual value of $44.01 billion in 2016.
“Our results suggest that there is a substantial movement in the last [2] years in the generic sector towards using merger and acquisition deals to grow rather than traditional greenfield investments,” the authors note, saying that, since 2011, 3 mergers were announced at values over $10 billion each.
The paper states that mergers and acquisitions are on the upswing because of the following factors:
These shifts in the competitive landscape signal a change in the economic structures of the generics and biosimilars sector, say the authors. In order to ensure protection against unwarranted price increases or drug shortages, “Antitrust authorities should scrutinize current practices, public drug plans should consider modifying their procurement process to ensure the safety of drug supply, and governments could also explore the possibility of establishing public generic manufacturers,” the authors conclude.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.