Because patients with rheumatoid arthritis may have compromised manual dexterity, they may have challenges with self-administering their biologic therapies. In the case of etanercept, which is typically administered once per week, device design that prioritizes ease of use can help improve patient adherence to treatment regimens.
Because patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have compromised manual dexterity, they may have challenges with self-administering their biologic therapies. In the case of etanercept, which is typically administered once per week, device design that prioritizes ease of use can help improve patient adherence to treatment regimens.
A recent survey, results of which were published in Patient Preference and Adherence, investigated European patients’ preferences concerning different attributes of autoinjectors and their preferences among 4 autoinjector devices. A separate survey, completed by nurses who train patients with RA to use self-administration devices, sought to confirm findings on patient satisfaction.
Read more about autoinjector device design.
In total, 200 patients with RA—in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom—participated in the survey. The patients were then using the reference etanercept (Enbrel) MyClic device (n = 70), the biosimilar etanercept (Benepali) Molly device (n = 54), and the reference adalimumab (Humira) pen device (n = 76). Patients also tested a demonstration autoinjector for a new biosimilar etanercept (Erelzi) autoinjector device, SensoReady. A total of 100 nurses from the same countries were also recruited.
The patients surveyed reported that the most important attributes of autoinjectors were, on a 10-point scale on which 10 represented the highest level of importance:
The nurse group also rated ease of self-injection and ease of grip as important, but also rated starting the injection process without the need to push a button and the shape of the device as important.
Patients were asked to compare their current autoinjector device with the SensoReady device, and nurses were asked to compare it with all 3 available autoinjectors. When asked which device they would recommend to a patient with RA who had not used an autoinjector before, the majority of patients chose the SensoReady (81%), as did the majority of nurses (90%). Attributes of the device identified as important for preferring the SensoReady device included ease of use, shape, and provision of visual feedback.
The investigators concluded that in the patients with RA and nurses surveyed in 5 nations, the SensoReady device was considered easier to use than existing autoinjector device options for biologic therapy.
Reference
Tischer B, Mehl A. Patients’ and nurses preferences for autoinjectors for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a European survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;2(12):1413-1424. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S169339.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.