Pharmacists need to brush up on their knowledge of the interchangeable biosimilar designation, investigators said in a survey presentation at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2021 meeting.
Pharmacists have limited awareness of concepts underlying FDA approval of the interchangeable designation for biosimilars, according to survey findings presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus 2021 meeting.
Just 20% correctly answered that based on FDA approval of interchangeable status, a pharmacist can substitute a biosimilar for a reference drug without consulting with the prescribing physician.
Slightly more than half (53%) correctly answered that it is “appropriate for a pharmacist to dispense an interchangeable biosimilar in place of its reference product without authorization from the prescriber if consistent with state law.”
Community pharmacists (50%) were less likely to answer this question correctly than those in other practice settings (54%-61%).
“Additional and focused educational strategies for US pharmacists are required to bridge these gaps and increase confidence in dispensing biosimilars,” authors of the study concluded.
States do have ultimate say in allowing biosimilars to be used interchangeably, although the FDA is the granting authority when it comes to approving biosimilars as interchangeable with their reference products. There are 2 approved interchangeable biosimilars: Semglee (insulin glargine) and Cyltezo (adalimumab). Only Semglee is on the market currently.
All states have passed laws governing how interchangeable biosimilars may be dispensed. Cardinal Health has documented these in an extensive state-by-state user guide.
The survey was conducted in March 2021, prior to when the first US interchangeable biosimilar was approved (July 2021), and pharmacist respondents were relatively unaware that no biosimilars had been designated as interchangeable when they answered the questionnaire. Just 11% answered correctly that all of 12 biosimilars on a list were not interchangeable. “Awareness was slightly higher among managed care pharmacists in other practice settings,” the authors wrote.
In the survey findings, which were presented at the AMCP Nexus 2021 meeting, investigators described the increasing relevance of biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars to the practice of pharmacy.
“The potential to deliver cost savings may increase patient access to biologic therapies and help control overall health care costs,” they wrote.
In conducting the survey, they sought to plug gaps in available quantitative data on US pharmacists’ attitudes toward and understanding of biosimilars. Investigators derived their data from 500 survey forms (curated from 992 individual responses) representative of the Northeast, South, Midwest, and West.
The survey consisted of 36 questions that assessed biosimilar knowledge and understanding from FDA approval to state pharmacy law and patient involvement.
Investigators said 81% of respondents correctly answered that a biosimilar approved for all the same indications of the reference product is not automatically interchangeable with that product.
Hospital or health system pharmacists got this question right (71%) less often than those in other practice settings (81%-96%), and investigators said it was probably because the general use of “therapeutic equivalence” in health care systems can be confusing.
They said 83% correctly responded that an interchangeable biosimilar is not the same thing as a generic drug.
A higher percentage (86%) correctly answered that switching studies are required for a biosimilar to demonstrate interchangeability and involve multiple switches from reference drug to biosimilar.
They said 16% answered incorrectly that all biosimilars are approved as being interchangeable.
Most pharmacists answered correctly (87%) that noninterchangeable biosimilars are as safe and effective as interchangeable biosimilars.
Just 51% of pharmacists said they were at least moderately comfortable answering patients’ questions about biosimilars, and 29% said they were “somewhat” comfortable.
Just 36% of pharmacists said they always or mostly involve patients in decisions about starting therapy with a biosimilar and switching to a biosimilar, whereas 32% said they “sometimes” do.
Investigators said 66% of the respondents worked in a community setting. The remainder were evenly split among home care or home infusion settings, ambulatory or outpatient centers, or specialty pharmacy and hospital/health system environments. A smaller percentage, 5%, worked in a managed care setting.
Investigators said 32% had practiced pharmacy for more than 20 years and 37% for 10 years or fewer.
“The majority of respondents correctly stated that a biosimilar has equivalent efficacy (87%) and comparable safety (91%) to its reference product,” they wrote.
The pharmacists were better versed in state laws on pharmacy and “correctly answered further questions on state pharmacy laws and biosimilar substitution,” the report said.
Reference
Stevenson JG, McCabe D, McGrath M, McBride A. A survey to assess pharmacists’ knowledge and understanding of biosimilars and interchangeability. Poster presented at: AMCP Nexus 2021; October 18-21, 2021.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.