A Danish study reports that switching from the originator drug infliximab (Remicade) to biosimilar CT-P13 (Inflectra/Remsima) does not appear to have had a negative effect on inflammatory arthritis disease activity in over 800 patients after 1 year of follow up. The study was published in the May 4, 2017 issue of Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
These results concur with findings presented at the Digestive Disease Week 2017 in Chicago last week.
The switch from Remicade to Inflectra was initiated by a Danish national guideline that all patients treated with infliximab should switch to the biosimilar for economic (not medical) reasons by May 2015. Patients and physicians had no say in the matter. In January 2017, the FDA issued a draft guidance about biosimilar interchangeability that recommended these kinds of switching studies be done to address safety and efficacy concerns around biosimilars.
The patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) and were enrolled in the DANBIO rheumatic disease registry. Disease activities 3 months before and after the medication switch and changes over time were calculated.
A total of 802 patients (403 RA, 120 PsA, and 279 AxSpA; 51% women; median age 55) were switched from Remicade to Inflectra. The average treatment duration with the originator drug, prior to the switch to the biosimilar, was 6.8 years (range, 4.3 to 9.5 years). Follow up was 413 days, during which 16% stopped taking the biosimilar, mostly because of lack of effect or adverse events.
Bente Glintborg, MD, of the Rigshospitalet in Glostrup, and colleagues write that disease activities were similar 3 months before and following the switch from Remicade to the biosimilar infliximab. The absolute retention rates were 83.4% for the biosimilar and 86.8% for Remicade (P = .03), an absolute difference of 3.4%. Flare rate, defined as a change in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score greater than or equal to 1.2 (RA/PsA) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score greater than or equal to 1.3, were also similar.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study of large-scale, nonmedical switching in routine care with prospective data collection,” the authors write. The availability of historic DANBIO disease registry data allowed the researchers to use the patients as their own controls with respect to fluctuations in disease activity before and after the switch, and to identify a historic infliximab cohort for comparison of retention rates. Patients whose previous infliximab treatment was longer than 5 years had a greater biosimilar retention rate. Retention rates for the biosimilar across diagnoses were comparable, though slightly lower for RA patients.
The study authors noted that the difference between 1-year retention rates for the biosimilar could be slightly lower than the originator drug because of a so-called “nocebo effect,” that is, negative expectations toward the drug or residual confounding.
The study was funded in part by a research grant from AbbVie.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.