Biosimilar SB17 demonstrated clinical biosimilarity to reference ustekinumab after switching and maintained long-term comparable efficacy and safety up to week 52.
Biosimilar SB17 demonstrated clinical biosimilarity to reference ustekinumab after switching and maintained long-term comparable efficacy and safety up to week 52. | Image Credit: Егор Кулинич - stock.adobe.com
Patients with psoriasis who switched from reference ustekinumab to its biosimilar, SB17, experienced comparable long-term efficacy and safety, alleviating concerns about switching and promoting wider use of more affordable treatment options, according to a study published in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment.1
Biologic treatments have improved efficacy and revolutionized the treatment landscape of psoriasis because they offer more affordable options to patients. The FDA reported generic and biosimilar medicines generated over $3 trillion in savings for patients and the health care system for the last 10 years.2
Concerns surrounding switching from originators to biosimilars are often based on fears that patients would experience adverse outcomes like diminished efficacy or increased hypersensitivity.1 However, previous research found that the rates of serious adverse events, deaths, and treatment discontinuations among patients who switched between a biosimilar and a reference biologic were similar to those among patients who did not switch.3
Additional clinical evidence has shown that switching from an originator product to a biosimilar version is safe and effective long-term and that itdoes not lead to undesirable clinical outcomes.1 Biosimilar SB17 is approved in both the US and Europe for patients with plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease.
The phase 3, randomized double-blind, multicenter trial was conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of switching between SB17 and reference ustekinumab to determine if clinical biosimilarity remained up to week 52. There were 45 centers from 8 countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Republic of Korea, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, and Ukraine) who participated during July 2021 to November 2022.
There were 503 participants as baseline who had a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to 12, a Physician’s Global Assessment of 3 or more, and a body surface area involvement of at least 10% at screening and randomization or more. At week 28, there were 481 participants who were rerandomized to either continue SB17 (SB17+SB17; n = 237), switch from ustekinumab to SB17 (UST+SB17; n = 122), or continue ustekinumab (UST+UST; n = 122).
Most of the participants (96.9%) completed the study up to week 52, with a balanced drop-out pattern (SB17+SB17, 1.7%; UST+SB17, 4.1%; UST+UST, 4.9%).
Across all treatment groups, the PASI from baseline up to week 52 was nearly identical, showing no signs of lack of efficacy. At week 52, the percent change of PASI was comparable between treatment groups (SB17+SB17, 95.8%; UST+SB17, 95.6%; UST+UST, 94.5%). The secondary efficacy endpoints from baseline to week 40 to week 52 were comparable across all 3 treatment groups.
Biosimilar SB17 and reference ustekinumab had similar safety profiles. The treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 16.5% for patients who continued SB17, 13.9% for patients who switched from ustekinumab to SB17, and 23.8% for patients who did not switch from the reference product. The most common TEAEs were COVID-19 and nasopharyngitis. There were no injection site reactions or systemic hypersensitivity found after switching between medications either.
The ongoing war in Ukraine posed a study limitation, disrupting some sites. However, these disruptions were evenly distributed across treatment groups, minimizing any potential bias.
These findings “may not prevent nocebo effects post-market, which may require additional efforts to mitigate” but“the lack of safety issues with ustekinumab switching to SB17 should be reassuring,” stated study authors.
References
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Biosimilars in Action: Market Shifts, Legal Insights, and FDA Approvals
February 9th 2025In this episode of Not So Different, host Skylar Jeremias covers the latest biosimilar developments, including new FDA approvals, patent disputes, and biosimilar market trends shaping the health care landscape.
Resolution of Injection Site Reactions After Switching to Adalimumab Biosimilar
February 22nd 2025A 15-year-old girl with ulcerative colitis who developed injection site reactions to the adalimumab reference product was successfully switched to the biosimilar LBAL without recurrence of symptoms, demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of switching for medical reasons, likely due to an allergic reaction to an excipient in the originator.