As more biosimilars make their way to patients in the United States and Europe, stakeholders seek reassurance on switching to these products. A newly published systematic review sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of switching between reference and biosimilar infliximab in patients with inflammatory disorders.
As more biosimilars make their way to patients in the United States and Europe, stakeholders seek reassurance on switching to these products. A newly published systematic review sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of switching between reference and biosimilar infliximab in patients with inflammatory disorders.
The review, funded by Janssen, relies on English-language journal articles on biosimilar infliximab published between 2004 and 2018 that were identified through the MEDLINE database. The 36 studies eligible for inclusion all reported efficacy, safety, or immunogenicity data. Additionally, 34 abstracts from 2012 to 2017 were sourced from major meetings using the EMBASE database.
In total, 13 publications presented results from 6 randomized controlled trials of SB2 (Renflexis), CT-P13 (Inflectra), and BOW015 (an unapproved product developed by Epirus), and all 6 were single-transition studies:
An additional 53 publications report switching from reference infliximab to biosimilars in observational studies, but no studies report switching among biosimilars. Most uncontrolled studies did not report changes in safety, efficacy, or immunogenicity after a switch: “While several uncontrolled studies did report high rates of failure or discontinuation after transition, this was not consistently observed across studies,” write the authors.
Finally, 2 case studies reported lichenoid drug eruption and serum sickness-like disease in patients with CD and RA after switching to CT-P13, and a case series of 3 patients with Behçet disease reported loss of response after a switch to CT-P13. An additional case series reported maintained safety and efficacy in 9 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who switched to CT-P13.
“Overall, the evidence presented is this review is generally supportive of the safety and efficacy of one‐time switching between reference and biosimilar infliximab. However, after conducting this systematic review of the literature, we concluded that there was insufficient data to perform a meaningful meta‐analysis at this time,” conclude the authors. “Additionally, no studies have investigated multiple switching scenarios or switching between biosimilars, which may be representative of real‐world situations.”
Reference
Feagan BG, Lam G, Ma C, Lichtenstein GR. Systematic review: efficacy and safety of switching patients between reference and biosimilar infliximab.Aliment Pharmacol Ther.2018;1-10. doi: 10.1111/apt.14997.
Resolution of Injection Site Reactions After Switching to Adalimumab Biosimilar
February 22nd 2025A 15-year-old girl with ulcerative colitis who developed injection site reactions to the adalimumab reference product was successfully switched to the biosimilar LBAL without recurrence of symptoms, demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of switching for medical reasons, likely due to an allergic reaction to an excipient in the originator.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.