Interest in needle-free drug delivery has increased as biologics manufacturers look for ways to give their originator drugs a competitive advantage over oncoming biosimilar competition.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd has announced that it has partnered with Portal, a Massachusetts-based medical device manufacturer, to develop a needle-free approach to administering biologics that are currently administered via injection. The companies plan to initially test Portal’s delivery system, which uses pressurized liquids, on Takeda’s top-selling biologic, vedolizumab (Entyvio), which is used to treat ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The companies will eventually evaluate Portal’s needle-free delivery system across a range of Takeda’s investigational and marketed biologics.
The delivery system works by pressuring the liquid drug into a jet that pierces the skin on contact, and delivers the drug to the target area in approximately half a second. The Portal device is digitally-controlled and precise, and takes into consideration factors such as changes in drug viscosity due to temperature. The device has been clinically shown to be less painful than a standard injection, and is preferred by patients, according to the company. The needle-free device could be used by patients at home; patients load the reusable device with a disposable, pre-filled cartridge and self-administer the drug.
Takeda’s interest in needle-free drug delivery is consistent with industry trends, as the challenges of subcutaneous delivery of biologics have become a target for partnership and development. Patient adherence is an issue for drug companies marketing and developing biologics, as most biologics must be administered intravenously or subcutaneously rather than orally because of the size and complexity of the molecules involved.
Portal notes that administering biologics via injection often causes patient anxiety—different than “needle phobia”—because injection can be painful, especially as the needle must remain in the patient for 10 to 20 seconds to administer a complete dose. As a consequence, treatment adherence rates for biologics are less than optimal, and are thought to be in the 40% to 70% range, depending on the indication. Some patients may even refuse a therapy if it requires needle-based self-injection. In addition, drug volumes to be injected are getting larger, and concentrations are getting higher, increasing patient discomfort and the potential for infusion-site reactions as well as skin damage.
Thus, interest in needle-free drug delivery has increased as biologics manufacturers look for ways to give their originator drugs a competitive advantage over oncoming biosimilar competition. A needle-free delivery method for originator biologic drugs is expected to augment Takeda’s revenues; Entyvio is the company’s highest-selling drug, with $592 million in sales.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.