Julie M. Reed, the new executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, gives a timeline of her career in the biosimilars space and what led her to be one of the founders of the organization.
Julie M. Reed, the new executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, gives a timeline of her career in the biosimilars space and what led her to be one of the founders of the organization.
Transcript
You are one of the founders of the Biosimilars Forum. What was it about biosimilars that got you involved with this line of work in the first place?
So, I'm old and I've had an incredible career, where my first job was as a clinician and then as a hospital administrator and nursing home administrator. Then I moved over into pharma. And I've always been mainly on the generic drug side. And then, as I developed my career in government affairs and policy, I was with Hospira. Hospira was one of the first biosimilar companies in the world. My CEO and the board decided that biosimilars and creating a biosimilars pathway was a major strategic goal. And so with my health care background, my generic drug background, and my working with patients and seeing the cost of health care, it was quite an honor to be to be tapped on the shoulder and say, "Julie, our strategic priority is to develop a biosimilars pathway and we we want you to go do that."
So, I been there from the beginning, not just in biosimilars in the United Staes and lobbying to get the BPCIA [Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act] passed, I've also worked around the world helping to develop the pathways and launched biosimilars in Europe and Japan and everywhere where nobody knew what a biosimilar was; it was a new word. Can you imagine? And we had to tell everybody what it meant and what it was about and how policies had to change.
I was, I hope, a driving force and continue to be a driving force in seeing that happen. So, it's a passion of mine, and it's been an incredibl amount of fun.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.