How will the 35% price discount by Merck/Samsung Bioepis on their infliximab biosimilar, compared with the reference, influence stakeholder uptake?
Infliximab-abda (Renflexis), biosimilar to Janssen Biotech tumor necrosis factor inhibitor infliximab (Remicade), is being introduced into the US market at a list price of $753.39, which represents a 35% discount off the current list price of Remicade. Merck and Samsung Bioepis have made a bold move by introducing the second biosimilar to Remicade at a significant discount.
Remicade and its 2 biosimilars, infliximab-abda and infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra) are long term treatments that are, for the most part, administered under the medical benefit.
Celltrion’s and Pfizer’s Inflectra has struggled to capture market share from Remicade due to factors such as offering a low discount (15%) off the originator’s list price and not being able to overcome effective contracting strategies and additional discounts provided by Janssen. Remicade erosion was targeted to be somewhere between 10%-15% and the erosion has been only about 5% in Q2 2017, which is less severe than expected.
In order to successfully capture more of Remicade’s US market share and $4.84 B in annual sales, Merck and Samsung Bioepsis have offered a 35% discount off the list price of Remicade. This discount, which is more than double Inflectra’s discount, will influence commercial insurers to evaluate the opportunity and then perhaps implement medical benefit (as well as pharmacy benefit) formulary changes to prefer Renflexis over Remicade. Additionally, this discount may encourage organizations that administer these drugs (ie, health systems) to begin utilizing and stocking up on Renflexis. Under the current Medicare Part B coding and reimbursement policy for biosimilars, providers will likely profit from a good portion of the 20% price difference between Renflexis and Inflectra, which share the same billing code.
The introduction of a second biosimilar, and future biosimilars, to Remicade along with a favorable management by insurers and utilization by organizations administering these drugs will help advance price competition, increase market share for biosimilars, and improve access for patients in the United States. We will see over the course of 2017 and 2018 whether the discount offered by Merck and Samsung was enough to influence insurers to prefer the biosimilar over the innovator.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.