The TITRATE study is designed to investigate whether intensive management of RA leads to a greater number of remissions at 12 months, in addition to examining levels of disability, quality of life and acceptability, and cost-effectiveness.
In the United Kingdom, there is a lack of nationally agreed treatment protocols for patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have intermediate disease activity. In order to address the lack of treatment consensus, a new study, TITRATE, is being conducted in over 40 hospitals in the United Kingdom. TITRATE is designed to investigate whether intensive management of RA leads to a greater number of remissions at 12 months, in addition to examining levels of disability, quality of life and acceptability, and cost-effectiveness.
The study comprises 398 patients with established RA. Researchers enrolled patients with intermediate disease activity, defined as a disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS28) assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 3.2 to 5.1 with at least 3 active joints, and the use of 1 or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (dMARD).
TITRATE will be a 12-month, pragmatic, randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Participants in the study are randomly selected to receive either intensive management or the current standard of care.
Intensive management will involve monthly clinical reviews with a specialist health practitioner, and drug treatment will be individualized and optimized based on several principles of motivational interviewing to address identified problem areas, such as pain, fatigue, and adherence.
Standard care will follow the standard local pathways in the United Kingdom in line with current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The patients will be assessed during enrollment and at 6 and 12 months through questionnaires and clinical evaluation.
The primary outcome measure of the study is the number of patients in each treatment arm who achieve remission as measured by DAS28-ESR. In addition, running concurrently with the trial is a cost-utility analysis to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of intense management compared to that of standard care. This analysis is being conducted in line with the NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal.
In preparing for the start of the trial, researchers noted 3 potential problems within the patient population selected for study: the potential heterogeneity of this group of patients (including the potential presence of fibromyalgic RA that may not respond greatly to dMARDs), whether complete remission is the optimal target of the study (versus low disease activity), and the variability of experience among RA nurses in the United Kingdom due to the absence of accredited national training programs.
Researchers anticipate that, when the results of TITRATE are available, they will be able to inform the National Health Service of the United Kingdom on how best to manage this group of patients as well as the benefits of delivering a more intensive management approach.
References
Martin N, Ibrahim F, Tom B, et al. Does intensive management improve remission rates in patients with intermediate rheumatoid arthritis? (the TITRATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18:591. doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2330-8.
Cost-Efficiency in Action: Denmark's Transition to Biosimilar Adalimumab
January 14th 2025The nationwide mandatory switch from Humira (reference adalimumab) to biosimilar adalimumab in Denmark led to no increase in total health care costs over 9 months, with significant cost reductions for those who switched to GP2017 specifically, highlighting the economic feasibility of biosimilar adoption.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
How Vertical Integration Drives Innovation and Access in Biosimilars
December 27th 2024Elie Bahou, PharmD, highlights how vertical integration in the biosimilar industry streamlines costs, improves supply reliability, accelerates market adoption, and enhances patient access, while emphasizing the value of collaboration, quality control, and value-based contracts for sustainable health care delivery.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.