On Thursday, the Trump administration unveiled a new plan that it hopes will reduce Medicare’s costs for prescription drugs. Under the plan, announced by President Donald Trump in a speech made at HHS, CMS could set its prices for some drugs—including high-cost biologics—based on the prices paid in other nations.
On Thursday, the Trump administration unveiled a new plan that it hopes will reduce Medicare’s costs for prescription drugs. Under the plan, announced by President Trump in a speech made at HHS, CMS could set its prices for some drugs—including high-cost biologics—based on the prices paid in other nations.
Under the proposal, CMS would, beginning in 2020 and extending until 2025, use a model that it calls the International Pricing Index (IPI). This index would allow Medicare to more closely align its Medicare payment amount for selected Part B drugs with prices paid in other nations, and would allow for private-sector negotiation of drug costs. The payment model would overhaul current reimbursement for Part B drugs—which is based on average sales prices plus 4.3% as an add-on—in favor of a target price derived from the international price index. CMS says that this approach could generate a 30% savings in total spending for the selected drugs.
The IPI model would include mandatory participation from physician practices and hospital outpatient departments the supply included drugs (which would initially comprise single-source drugs and biologics). CMS adds that it hopes this model will reduce out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries, increase access and adherence, and create greater competition in the acquisition process for Part B drugs.
Announcement of the proposal came shortly after CMS revealed a new report comparing the prices charged by drug makers in the United States versus those charged in other countries. The report, which found that US prices are 1.8 times higher than ex-US prices, identified 27 products for comparison, and found that US prices are higher among 19 of these products. For another 8 products, US prices are within range of what other nations pay. According to the report, Medicare and its beneficiaries spend $8.1 billion more on drugs than they would if payments were scaled by international price ratios.
For example, in 2016, the United States spent approximately $1.7 billion on brand-name rituximab (Rituxan), but if Part B spending were scaled to an international volume-weighted price, it could spend approximately $640 million on rituximab. Similarly, 2016 spending on brand-name trastuzumab (Herceptin) was approximately $704 million, but could drop to approximately $340 million under the proposed plan.
Notably, the report’s figures do not take into account the prices of biosimilars; instead, it only compares prices for reference products. According to the report’s authors, this is in part because Medicare bills for biosimilars under separate billing codes.
In announcing the plan, Trump said that, with the new proposal, “We are taking aim at the global freeloading that forces American consumers to subsidize lower prices in foreign countries through higher prices in our country.” He went on to say that America conducts research and development for the rest of the world, and that “the world rigs the benefits of American genius and innovation,” and that seniors pick up the tab.
CMS will receive comments on the IPI model until Monday, December 31, and plans to issue a proposed rule on the model in the spring of 2019.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.