The researchers hypothesized that currently used doses of rituximab, of 375 mg/m2 or greater, significantly exceed the half-maximal effective dose of rituximab, at which differences between a biosimilar and the reference would be most likely to be found.
Among products that have thus far been candidates for biosimilar development, rituximab is unique in that it can be used in both oncology and rheumatology indications. However, dosing differs significantly for rituximab used in treating malignant versus nonmalignant disorders, and when rituximab is used off-label in treating immunological diseases, like multiple sclerosis, dosing schedules may vary even further.
This fact poses a challenge for demonstrating biosimilarity of a follow-on rituximab product in a patient population with nonmalignant disease, because no dose-finding trials are available in these indications, and it is as yet unclear which dose may be the most sensitive for detecting differences between proposed biosimilars and the reference rituximab.
A paper published in Scientific Reports describes 2 trials—an open-label, exploratory trial in healthy volunteers and a double-blind, randomized trial in healthy volunteers—that investigated the dose-response relationship of rituximab and a proposed biosimilar rituximab at low doses.
The researchers hypothesized that currently used doses of rituximab, of 375 mg/m2 or greater, significantly exceed the half-maximal effective dose of rituximab, at which differences between a biosimilar and the reference would be most likely to be found. Thus, their open-label trial assigned patients to receive either 0.1 mg/m2, 0.3 mg/m2, or 1.0 mg/m2 to identify the half-maximal effective dose of the reference product in vivo.
The trial enrolled 16 healthy volunteers, in whom rituximab depleted CD19-positive and CD20-positive cells from systemic circulation by the end of infusion. Mean CD20-positive cell counts decreased by approximately 97% in the 8 subjects in the 1-mg group, 74% in the 4 subjects in the 0.3-mg group, and 68% in the 4 subjects in the 0.1-mg group. Four weeks after infusion, CD20-positive cells returned to approximately 60% of baseline in the 1-mg group.
In the second trial, 36 volunteers were randomized to receive single infusions of either the reference rituximab or the proposed biosimilar at doses of either 0.1 mg/m2 or 0.3 mg/m2. Twelve participants each received the lower dose of the reference or the biosimilar, 8 received the higher dose of the biosimilar, and 4 received the higher dose of the reference.
In the lower-dose reference group, rituximab reduced the CD20-positive cell count by a mean of 48% (range, 25%-84%) and in the lower-dose biosimilar group, by a mean of 55% (range, 26%-85%).
In the higher-dose reference group, rituximab decreased CD20-positive cell counts by a mean of 81% (range, 67%-89%), and in the higher-dose biosimilar group, by a mean of 87% (range, 77%-96%).
The authors write that the half-maximal effective dose to deplete CD20-positive B cells with rituximab is 0.1 mg/m2, which represents “only a tiny fraction” of currently approved and used doses. Furthermore, they write, “Our results suggest that comparison of the effects of rituximab in the steep part of the dose-response curve is no longer possible when doses reach 1 mg/m2.” These findings will need to be verified in clinical trials involving patients, they add.
Reference
Schoergenhofer C, Schwameis M, Firbas C, et al. Single, very low rituximab doses in healthy volunteers—a pilot and a randomized trial: implications for dosing an biosimilarity testing. Sci Rep. 2018;8:124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17934-6.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.