The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) of the United Kingdom has announced it is investigating whether Merck unfairly offered a discount scheme to protect sales of its drug infliximab (Remicade) against competition from new biosimilars hitting the market.
According to the CMA—a governmental office that regulates fair market competition in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland—the investigation has been ongoing since December 2015. This week, it announced the issuance of a “statement of objections,” which alleges wrongdoing but is not a conclusive finding of guilt. Its provisional statement is that Merck “operated an anti-competitive discount scheme” by “abusing its dominant position” in the market.
Additional information on the case indicates that Merck’s discount scheme was employed “in relation to the supply of Remicade to the NHS.” The National Health Service is the largest buyer of pharmaceuticals in the United Kingdom, and drug prices are determined through negotiations between manufacturers and the government.
The alleged scheme was employed to ensure sales of infliximab remained steady despite influx of cheaper infliximab biosimilars hitting the European market around that time. For instance, Inflectra and Remsima were approved by the European Medicines Agency in September 2013, while Flixabi was approved in May 2016.
According to a FiercePharma article from October 2015, Merck had offered the NHS discounts and rebates of about 25%, or £48 million off of £191 million in sales. A company spokesman said that the 2 competing biosimilars were being sold at discounts of between 25% and 30%. However, a representative of Napp Pharmaceuticals responded that its biosimilar Remsima had actually been sold to the NHS for prices 40% to 50% lower than the list price of Remicade.
In response, Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD), the overseas arm of Merck & Co, issued a statement denying the accusations. Both MSD and the New Jersey-based Merck & Co could be found jointly liable by the CMA of violating competition law, but the statement projected confidence that the ongoing investigation would absolve both of wrongdoing. “The discounts in question meant that infliximab was competitively priced and offered savings to the UK National Health Service, without hindering competition,” it explained.
Remicade, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor used to treat autoimmune diseases, is sold in the United States by Johnson & Johnson and licensed to MSD for international sales. With the FDA’s approval of Renflexis in April 2017, a year after the first biosimilar for infliximab (Inflectra) was approved, Johnson & Johnson is also facing cost pressures from new competition. However, the biosimilars have not significantly eaten into Remicade’s market position in the United States, as they have not been deemed interchangeable and Inflectra was priced at only a 15% discount to Remicade.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512