This week, the insurer rolled out some of the changes it will be implementing in its Medicare Advantage (MA) plans as of January 1, 2019.
When CMS announced in August 2018 its policy change to allow Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to utilize step therapy as a way to negotiate drug prices, UnitedHealthcare, the nation’s largest MA carrier, publicly celebrated the decision. This week, the insurer rolled out some of the changes it will be implementing in its MA plans as of January 1, 2019.
In a bulletin released this month, UnitedHealthcare stated that it will employ step therapy to control costs of biologics, such as reference infliximab, sold as Remicade. Now listed as preferred drugs on its MA plan, which requires the product to be used first before a patient moves to another therapy, are infliximab biosimilars, Inflectra and Renflexis.
In addition, UnitedHealthcare has also listed biosimilar epoetin alfa, sold as Retacrit, as a preferred drug; however, it noted that step therapy will not apply to this product, or to patients already taking epoetin.
UnitedHealthcare also wrote that biosimilar pegfilgrastim, sold as Fulphila, and biosimilar filgrastim, sold as Nivestym, will require prior authorization when administered to patients with cancer in an outpatient setting.
When CMS Administrator Seema Verma announced the change in policy for MA plans, she indicated that it was her hope for MA plans to begin treatment with a cost-effective biosimilar before progressing to a more expensive therapy if the treatment was ineffective. Notably, however, she did not specify whether patients would be switched to a biosimilars reference product, or whether patients would be required to begin treatment with a biosimilar of one therapy before being permitted to cycle to a different biologic treatment altogether.
Contrary to UnitedHealthcare welcoming this policy change, rheumatology and oncology providers have expressed concern over the move, as step therapy, often referred to by critics as “fail-first,” can be harmful to patients with chronic conditions.
When speaking about step therapy proposals as a whole, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) president, David Daikh, MD, PhD, said “While we support the goal of decreasing the cost of medications, the ACR has long opposed step therapy and other utilization management techniques that undermine the clinical judgement of providers, delay access to needed treatments, and put our patients’ health at unnecessary risk.”
Echoing this concern, The Community Oncology Alliance president called the change the “antithesis of where personalized cancer treatment is going,” and spoke out against the “one-size-fits-all” approach of treatment.
As of now, UnitedHealthcare is the only major insurer to publicly announce employing step therapy in its MA plans for 2019. In an email to The American Journal of Managed Care®, a sister site of The Center for Biosimilars®, a representative from Aetna explained that it is still evaluating whether or not to employ step therapy, and a representative from Kaiser Permanente confirmed that it will not be utilizing step therapy in 2019, but is evaluating making the change in 2020.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.