The best predictors of which US counties’ patients are most likely to be prescribed higher-priced drugs are income, healthcare costs, and access to exercise opportunities, according to a new study published online in Nature Communications.
The best predictors of which US counties’ patients are most likely to be prescribed higher-priced drugs are income, healthcare costs, and access to exercise opportunities, according to a new study published online in Nature Communications.
Other factors such as state-level laws, insurance networks, or cultural preferences likely explain the remaining variance in brand preference across US counties, according to researchers Rachel D. Melamed, PhD, and Andrey Rzhetsky, PhD, of the University of Chicago. They concluded that a “patchwork” of contrasting medication cultures is in place across the nation, showing “geographically separated sub-Americas” that demonstrate the influences of racial composition, state-level healthcare laws, and wealth.
Their findings are based on an analysis of Truven MarketScan medical claims data covering more than 150 million individuals (nearly half the country’s population), followed for up to 10 years (2003-2013). The authors focused on comparing prescription rates of the 598 most highly prescribed drugs in more than 2300 US counties. The data contain a total of approximately 36 million patient-years.
Among the study’s findings are the following:
The study was funded by the DARPA Big Mechanism program and by National Institutes of Health grants.
Reference
Melamed RD, Rzhetsky A. Patchwork of contrasting medication cultures across the USA. Nature Communications.2018;9:4022. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06205-1.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.