Using the biosimilar resulted in a significantly lower drug acquisition cost, at $533.40 in the biosimilar group versus $1261.90 in the reference group.
In autologous stem cell transplantation, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) is crucial, and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapies plays a key role in ensuring success. Lower-cost biosimilar G-CSF agents may be a way to reduce the overall cost of treatment, and in a recent study in a single center in Singapore, researchers found that a biosimilar filgrastim, Pfizer’s Nivestim (sold in the US market as Nivestym), was safe and noninferior to its reference, Neupogen, in mobilizing stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation.
In the study, all patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation between 2011 and 2016 were included in the retrospective cohort. Those treated up to March 2014 (n = 66) had received the reference filgrastim, while those treated afterward received the biosimilar (n = 65). Patient characteristics were similar with the exception of chemo-mobilization regimen.
The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients who had successful mobilization, which was defined as a harvest of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells per kilogram of bodyweight.
In the biosimilar group and the reference group, mobilization was successful in 96.9% and 97% of patients, respectively (P = .988). The authors noted that the number of CD34+ cells mobilized was higher in the biosimilar group, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Safety was also similar; the incidence and severity of adverse events were comparable between the groups, with headache, back pain, and bone pain being the most commonly reported.
Notably, the median length of hospital stay required for mobilization was significantly shorter in the biosimilar group (15 days) than in the reference group (17 days), and the duration of G-CSF use per mobilization was lower in the biosimilar group (9 days) than in the reference group (10 days).
Using the biosimilar also resulted in a significantly lower drug acquisition cost, at $533.40 in the biosimilar group versus $1261.90 in the reference group (P <.0001).
According to the authors, using the biosimilar to mobilize stem cells was both safe and noninferior to using the reference filgrastim, and results in a lower drug cost and a potentially shorter length of hospitalization.
Reference
Chew C, Ng HY. Efficacy and safety of Nivestim versus Neupogen for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation [published online December 27, 2019]. Sci Rep. 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56477-w.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Similar Survival, Safety for Bevacizumab Biosimilar vs Originator in Colorectal Cancer
February 8th 2025A retrospective observational study found no significant differences in progression-free survival or safety in patients with colorectal cancers in Japan treated with ABP 215, Amgen’s bevacizumab biosimilar, or reference bevacizumab (Avastin), and estimated cost savings of 800,000 Japanese yen (approximately $5100) per patient with the biosimilar.