Using the biosimilar resulted in a significantly lower drug acquisition cost, at $533.40 in the biosimilar group versus $1261.90 in the reference group.
In autologous stem cell transplantation, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) is crucial, and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapies plays a key role in ensuring success. Lower-cost biosimilar G-CSF agents may be a way to reduce the overall cost of treatment, and in a recent study in a single center in Singapore, researchers found that a biosimilar filgrastim, Pfizer’s Nivestim (sold in the US market as Nivestym), was safe and noninferior to its reference, Neupogen, in mobilizing stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation.
In the study, all patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation between 2011 and 2016 were included in the retrospective cohort. Those treated up to March 2014 (n = 66) had received the reference filgrastim, while those treated afterward received the biosimilar (n = 65). Patient characteristics were similar with the exception of chemo-mobilization regimen.
The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients who had successful mobilization, which was defined as a harvest of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells per kilogram of bodyweight.
In the biosimilar group and the reference group, mobilization was successful in 96.9% and 97% of patients, respectively (P = .988). The authors noted that the number of CD34+ cells mobilized was higher in the biosimilar group, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. Safety was also similar; the incidence and severity of adverse events were comparable between the groups, with headache, back pain, and bone pain being the most commonly reported.
Notably, the median length of hospital stay required for mobilization was significantly shorter in the biosimilar group (15 days) than in the reference group (17 days), and the duration of G-CSF use per mobilization was lower in the biosimilar group (9 days) than in the reference group (10 days).
Using the biosimilar also resulted in a significantly lower drug acquisition cost, at $533.40 in the biosimilar group versus $1261.90 in the reference group (P <.0001).
According to the authors, using the biosimilar to mobilize stem cells was both safe and noninferior to using the reference filgrastim, and results in a lower drug cost and a potentially shorter length of hospitalization.
Reference
Chew C, Ng HY. Efficacy and safety of Nivestim versus Neupogen for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation [published online December 27, 2019]. Sci Rep. 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56477-w.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.