The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) announced that it will not be moving forward with its proposed revisions to drug product monographs for biologic medicines.
The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) recently announced that it will not be moving forward with its proposed revisions to drug product monographs for biologic medicines.
The proposed amendment sought to address the naming of biologic products licensed under the Public Health Service Act. For such products, “the official title shall be the title specified in the relevant monograph plus any suffix designated by the FDA unless otherwise specified in the applicable monograph.”
The revision received pushback from the FDA in the form of a letter, citing concerns that monographs for biologics could inhibit or delay innovative technology, and could be viewed as an additional burden on regulated industry.
“FDA is committed to supporting a robust marketplace of biological products that provide innovative, accessible, therapeutic options to patients. The timely licensure of biosimilar and interchangeable products is essential to achieving greater price competition in this marketplace, which can help bring down the cost of biological products. Thus, any delay in licensure of biosimilar or interchangeable products could cause these potential savings to consumers and the healthcare system to be lost,” the FDA’s letter said.
As of last week, USP stated that it will not move forward in addressing nomenclature issues without further collaboration with the FDA, as well as other stakeholders.
USP also indicated that it will continue its focus on developing “performance standards” applicable to classes of biologics, as well as standards for raw materials. USP is “developing these standards by working closely with industry to identify key challenges in biologics development and establishing benchmarks for quality.”
Separately, USP noted that it intends to move forward with another revision that aims to ensure alignment with the FDA on the use of the term “with sensor” in approved product names for therapies that contain sensor technology. The revised language ensures the continued applicability of the USP monograph for the corresponding drug product. Though the USP has not received comments from the FDA on this amendment thus far, it noted in a statement that it has previously received FDA support for this change.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Revolutionizing Biopharmaceuticals: The EU's Biosimilar Success and Remaining Challenges
October 16th 2024The European Union's (EU) approach to biosimilars has revolutionized the biopharmaceutical market by driving innovation, lowering costs, and increasing adoption; however, there remains a need for more education, real-world evidence, and efforts to address challenges to enhance patient access and affordability.