Virginia’s House and Senate have both passed a new bill, HB1177, which prohibits PBMs from penalizing pharmacists for sharing drug pricing information with consumers.
Virginia’s House and Senate have both passed a new bill, HB1177, which prohibits PBMs from penalizing pharmacists for sharing drug pricing information with consumers. Sponsored by Republican representative Todd Pillion of Virginia’s fourth district, the bill would give pharmacists the freedom to inform patients about the cheapest option for their prescriptions.
PBMs were created to negotiate prices, discounts, and rebates with pharmaceutical manufacturers on behalf of insurance companies. In return, the drug companies' products are included on the PBMs’ formularies, and these savings are supposed to be passed onto the health plans PBMs work for, and to consumers in the form of lower prices. However, the amount that pharmaceutical companies are providing in rebates and the subsequent amount that PBMs receive are not disclosed.
The lack of transparency among PBMs has allowed for so-called “clawbacks” to develop. CBS News reports that clawbacks occur when a patient’s co-pay or coinsurance is higher than the negotiated price of the drug, which allows the PBM to pocket, or claw back, the profit.
The Virginia law addresses these clawbacks by stating that no contract that is formed between a PBM and a pharmacy can contain provisions that authorize either the carrier or PBMs to charge, or require the pharmacist or pharmacy to collect, a co-payment for a covered prescription drug in an amount greater than cash price of the medicine.
The co-payment clawback is also the subject of several federal class-action lawsuits across the country. Pharmacy chains such as CVS and Walgreens were sued in 2017 for allegedly overcharging consumers buying generic drugs when they paid through their insurance plans, and consequently providing some of the profits back to PBMs.
The named plaintiff in the suit against CVS, Megan Schultz, paid $165 for a generic drug at a CVS pharmacy through her insurance. According to the lawsuit, had she paid cash, the drug would have cost $92. Similarly, the named plaintiff in the Walgreens suit, David Grabstald, alleges that he paid nearly double the cash price for his generic medication when paying through his insurance.
According to NBC, contracts signed between pharmacists and PBMs may include a gag order that prohibiting pharmacists from informing consumers of this overcharge, or recommending cheaper medications.
The recent legislation passed in Virginia removes the gag order and prohibits PBMs from penalizing pharmacists for sharing drug pricing information. Other states that have passed similar legislation to Virginia’s include California, Texas, Nevada, and North Dakota. Bill HB1177 will now be sent to Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, D, for signing.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.