A report from the National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions detailed the common concerns employers have regarding implementing biosimilars within their health care plans and outlined how they could take charge and make a difference.
When it comes to getting biosimilars on formulary lists, employers may have more power than they realize and could take a number of big actions to ensure they are achieving the greatest savings, according to a report from the National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions (National Alliance).
The report detailed biosimilar concerns and successes of 7 regional coalitions and over 60 employers and compiled a comprehensive list of key actions that employers could take to overcome obstacles to biosimilar adoption.
Reduced barriers could produce about $25 billion in savings over 10 years, which could total $133 billion by 2025 as policy makers take on a greater role in encouraging greater biosimilar adoption, according to the Association for Accessible Medicines.
The National Alliance conducted a presurvey, roundtable discussion and a post survey to gain intelligence on the challenges that employers are facing in regard to adopting biosimilars and the concerns surrounding pharmacy-benefit trends.
The National Alliance aggregated the results, finding 5 key themes for action:
Some employers raised concerns that adding biosimilars and reference biologics to health plans might worry or confuse plan members about whether their treatment regimens would be interrupted or if the move would trigger restrictions on reimbursements.
The National Alliance recommended that employers create an additional tier or preferred reimbursement for biosimilars and reference biologics to take advantage of savings related to unit prices. Employers could also add biosimilars to the branded tier without needing to change cost-sharing or co-pay models.
Employers expressed heavy agreement that consultants, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and insurance companies “sold” them on standardized formularies by telling them that they would have to pay extra to customize formulary lists if they wanted to add biosimilars or new reference drugs.
However, while some PBMs are restricting biosimilars from being added to formularies, employers can require them to be added without additional fees because there are not enough products to warrant a separate fee or a difference in administering claims. The National Alliance recommended that employers take control of formulary management, implement a formulary that is not driven by rebates, and request an audit of the current formulary.
Other recommendations that the organization had for employers included:
The report also included some top priorities for employers and purchasers to keep in mind over the next 2 years:
Reference
Rehayem M, Jung A. Improving drug management: employer strategies on biosimilars. National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions. February 22, 2022. Accessed February 24, 2022. https://connect.nationalalliancehealth.org/viewdocument/improving-drug-management-employer
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.