The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a fresh draft of its biosimilar evaluation guidelines. Medicines for Europe science and policy expert Marta Baldrighi, PhD, explains the significance.
The Center for Biosimilars® spoke recently with Marta Baldrighi, PhD, policy and science officer for Medicines for Europe, a trade organization of generics and biosimilars producers, about the World Health Organization’s ongoing revision of its guidelines for evaluation of biosimilars. Baldrighi was a presenter on the topic at the recent Terrapinn Festival of Biologics meeting in Basel, Switzerland.
The WHO’s revisions will help to clarify the evidence requirements that developers of “similar biological products,” or biosimilars, should aim to satisfy when developing these molecules. Regulatory authorities in the United States and the European Union are moving toward a streamlined or clinical trial (CT) “tailored approach” that allows biosimilar developers to focus on the most advanced analytical technologies for characterization of biosimilars (ie, ensuring equivalence with reference drug molecules) and avoid comparative clinical trials that are not as precise and contribute little, if anything, to the sum of significant evidence for judging equivalence between highly similar biologic medicines.
The WHO, in conducting this review process, is moving in step with advances in the United States and European Union and providing an implied endorsement of CT tailoring. Following a public comment period this year, the WHO in November 2021 released the second draft of the guidance, Baldrighi explains.
The inclusion of CT tailoring holds out significant potential for adding constructive flexibility to biosimilar development that could make it more achievable for manufacturers to develop orphan biosimilars (for rare diseases) and other types of molecules that, owing to prior regulatory standards, may have been too costly to produce, Baldrighi says.
Advanced molecular characterization techniques lower the cost of biosimilar development and can substitute for in-human clinical trials that may be difficult or impossible for companies to perform in cases where patients with these diseases or conditions are scarce, she explains.
The WHO is not a regulator in the sense that it reviews and authorizes investigational medicines for use, but it maintains a list of essential medicines that it judges are qualified for safe and efficacious use, and its recommended medicines are adopted by medical authorities and countries worldwide. These guidelines on evaluation of biosimilar medicines will provide biosimilar developers with the assurance that the evidence basis upon which their molecules are founded will be satisfactory to the WHO when it decides what medicines to endorse.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.