In December 2018, biosimilar developer Amgen announced that it had submitted its proposed infliximab biosimilar, ABP 710, referencing Remicade, to the FDA for review. A regulatory decision is expected shortly, and last week, researchers published detailed results from the biosimilar’s phase 1 clinical study that evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of the biosimilar with its reference.
In December 2018, biosimilar developer Amgen announced that it had submitted its proposed infliximab biosimilar, ABP 710, referencing Remicade, to the FDA for review. A regulatory decision is expected shortly, and last week, researchers published detailed results from the biosimilar’s phase 1 clinical study that evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of the biosimilar with its reference.
The randomized, single-blind, single-dose, 3-arm, parallel-group study was conducted among healthy volunteers at 2 centers in Australia. In total, 49 individuals were dosed, at 5 mg/kg, with the biosimilar, 50 with US-licensed reference infliximab, and 49 with EU-licensed reference infliximab. The primary end point was area under the serum concentration—time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf).
The geometric mean ratio of AUCinf was 0.89 between ABP 710 and the US-licensed reference, 1.00 between ABP 710 and the EU-licensed reference, and 1.11 between the US-licensed reference and the EU-licensed reference. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios were fully contained within the prespecified PK equivalence margin of 0.80 to 1.25. Additionally, the 90% CIs for the ratio of least squares geometric means for peak serum concentration and AUC to the last measurable concentration were fully contained within the same margin, confirming PK similarity.
With respect to safety, 83.7% of the biosimilar group, 86.0% of the US-licensed reference group, and 83.7% of the EU-licensed reference group reported any treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), and there was 1 serious AE, which was reported in the EU-licensed reference group. The most commonly reported AEs were somnolence, headache, and nasopharyngitis.
Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were developed by 39.6% of the biosimilar group, 32.0% of the US-licensed reference group, and 27.1% of the EU-licensed reference group though day 57. Neutralizing ADAs were detected in 12.5%, 10.0%, and 18.8% of the 3 groups, respectively. PK parameters were similarly affected by ADA binding status for all 3 treatment arms.
Results of the study, say the authors, demonstrate PK similarity among the 3 infliximabs, and the safety and immunogenicity profiles of the products were also similar.
Also part of the biosimilar’s clinical program was a phase 3 clinical trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Amgen announced positive topline results from that trial in 2018. Notably, while the current phase 1 study provides a bridge between the EU- and US-licensed reference drugs—as is common among biosimilars for which sponsors seek both approval of the same biosimilar in both the European Union and United States—Amgen has announced that it no longer intends to pursue regulatory approval in the EU marketplace. In May of 2019, the drug maker withdrew its application from the European Medicines Agency, citing a change of product strategy.
Reference
Chow V, Oh M, Gesner MA, Fanjiang G. Pharmacokinetic similarity of ABP 710, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab: results from a randomized, single-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in healthy subjects [published online October 19, 2019]. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.738.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.