The third in a series of clinical studies evaluating pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Biocon’s recombinant human insulins compared to their reference products, found PK and PD equivalence between the biosimilar insulin-70/30 and Humulin-70/30.
The third in a series of clinical studies evaluating pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Biocon’s recombinant human insulins compared to their reference products, the Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence-3 (RHINE-3) study found PK and PD equivalence between Biocon's Insulin-70/30 and Humulin-70/30. The investigators said both treatments were well-tolerated, and there were “no clinically relevant differences in the safety profiles” between the 2 treatments.
They expect that the biosimilar will be able to “provide reliable and affordable access to patients who are candidates for premixed-insulins.” Premixed insulins combine short-, intermediate-, and/or long-acting insulins to increase the convenience of dosing compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy, which requires at least 4 daily injections.
For patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) who require insulin daily, premixed insulins improve compliance, according to the authors, and usually require only 2 daily injections. Both the reference product and biosimilar 70/30 insulin products investigated in this study contain 70% intermediate-acting and 30% short-acting insulins.
The authors noted that rising insulin costs have made access more difficult for patients with diabetes, “especially mid- to low-income individuals, those on high deductible health plans, or those who are uninsured.” They cited research suggesting that approximately 1 fourth of US patients with diabetes ration their insulin because of the high cost. Biosimilar insulins could provide a lower-cost alternative, they said, especially now that the FDA has changed insulin’s status from a drug to a biologic, which “could facilitate approval of biosimilar insulins in the United States, enabling a competitive market.”
Plasma insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates (GIRs) were assessed over 24 hours in 74 healthy subjects who received a single dose of the biosimilar and reference product in random order.
The primary PK endpoints were the area under the insulin concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUCins.0-24h) and maximum insulin concentration (Cins.max). The primary PD endpoints were the area under the GIR time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUCGIR.0-24h) and maximum GIR (GIRmax).
Confidence Intervals Were Within the Equivalence Margins for Ratios of Primary PK and PD Endpoints
The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios of the biosimilar to the reference product were within the 80% to 125% equivalence range for both PK endpoints (95% CI, 89.2-97.4 for AUCins.0-24h; 95% CI, 88.3-97.9 for Cins.max). Confidence intervals for the primary PD endpoints were also within the equivalence margins (95% Ci, 84.2-96.1 for AUCGIR.0-24h; 95% CI, 86.0-98.5 for GIRmax).
Although secondary PK and PD endpoints were not required to meet equivalence criteria, the authors commented that several secondary endpoints did: AUCins.0-2h, AUCins.0-6h, AUCins.0-12h, AUCins.12-24h, AUCins.0−infinity, AUCGIR.0-6h, AUCGIR.0-12h, and AUCGIR.12-24h.
The investigators added that the quality of the euglycemic clamp was considered good and comparable between treatments. Regarding safety, there were 43 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 21 associated with the biosimilar and 18 with the reference product. Headache and hematoma were the most frequently reported TEAEs. There were no serious AEs, deaths, or discontinuations due to safety or tolerability reasons.
Reference
Plum-Mörschel L, Klein O, Singh G, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of Biocon's biosimilar Insulin 70/30 with US-licensed HUMULIN® 70/30 formulation in healthy subjects: results from the RHINE-3 (Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence-3) study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(9):1819-1828. doi:10.1111/dom.14768
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Ocrelizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.