Eculizumab biosimilar Elizaria demonstrates long-term safety and efficacy comparable with the reference product Soliris in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), according to a Russian study that expanded on a previous phase 3 study.
Eculizumab biosimilar Elizaria showed long-term safety and efficacy comparable with the reference agent in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), according to a recent study.1
The open-label, prospective, multicenter ECU-PNH-III-X study (NCT04679103) published in Acta Haematologica, was conducted as part of the clinical development process for Elizaria, with the cohort being recruited from a previous phase 3 clinical trial (NCT04463056) what demonstrated noninferiority of the biosimilar vs the originator (Soliris).
PNH is a rare blood condition in which a portion of the immune system attacks and damages red blood cells and platelets.2 If left untreated, the disease can lead to hemolytic anemia, chronic kidney disease, or thrombosis. Approximately 38 patients for every 1 million people are estimated to have PNH, with the incidence of the condition ranging from 0.08 to 0.57 per 100,000 person-years.3
Elizaria is a biosimilar developed by Russia-based company Generium and was approved by the Russian Ministry of Health (Minzdrav) in 2019 for the treatment of PNH and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.1 Although it was also developed in accordance with regulatory requirements of the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Medicines Agency, long-term data on eculizumab biosimilars remain limited.
The present study was conducted at 8 study sites. For inclusion, patients had to have completed the ECU-PNH-II and ECU-PNH-1b studies and be aged 23 to 75 years. After signing a consent form, 30 patients were enrolled. Prior to the study, 25 patients received Elizaria (Group A) and 5 patients had been administered Soliris (Group B). The study was broken up into 3 periods: the end of the study visit from the previous trial (first visit of the present study), the treatment period (up to 104 weeks), and the follow-up period (2 weeks).
Patients received a 900-mg maintenance dose of the biosimilar every 2 weeks, receiving from 18 to 44 injections overall (average [SD], 32.33 [6.74]). The median age of patients was 37 years (Group A median, 39 years; Group B median, 33 years), and the cohort mostly identified as women and Caucasian. Vascular diseases (50%) and cardiac diseases (36.7%) were the most common comorbidities.
Regarding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD), in group B, mean serum eculizumab concentrations showed variability but consistently exceeded 35 μg/mL, the level needed for complete inhibition of intravascular hemolysis. PD analysis revealed stable membrane attack complex levels across visits, ranging from 70.25 (34.86) ng/mL to 63.24 (31.44) ng/mL (P = .66), indicating effective biosimilar performance.
In the efficacy assessment, the median lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity remained stable throughout the study, ranging from 226 to 320 U/L, with median changes from baseline varying between −3.5 and −98.5 U/L (P = .21). Minor increases in LDH activity at weeks 64 and 68 were attributed to acute respiratory infection and chronic hepatitis exacerbation in 2 patients. No significant intergroup differences or changes from baseline were observed (P > .05). Both groups showed comparable mean hemoglobin level improvements by the study's end (3.7 [13.6] g/L in group A, 1.0 [2.5] g/L in group B; P = .36), with no significant changes at any visit compared with baseline.
The reticulocyte count remained stable throughout the study with no significant changes compared with baseline (P = .06), and both groups showed insignificant changes at the study's end. Both groups exhibited similar decreases in PNH type II and III red blood cells and granulocytes, with no significant differences (P > .05). Breakthrough hemolysis occurred in 4 patients in group A, 2 of whom experienced respiratory infections. Eight patients (27%) required red blood cell transfusions, with no significant difference between groups. No new thrombotic events were observed.
No cases of meningococcal or other complement-related infections were reported, and no severe adverse events related to hemolysis occurred. Two adverse reactions (alopecia in group A and elevated aspartate aminotransferase in group B) were mild or moderate and did not require treatment adjustment.
Binding antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were detected in 7 patients (23.3%), with no significant differences between groups. ADAs in group A showed no neutralizing activity or impact on efficacy or safety. One patient in group B had neutralizing antibodies, but these did not affect the study outcomes.
The study's main limitations were the small sample size due to the orphan status of eculizumab and reduced use of the originator, the absence of newly proposed response criteria for complement inhibitor therapy, and the lack of evaluation for extravascular C3-mediated hemolysis impacting erythroid response.
References
1. Kulagin AD, Putshkin VV, Lukina EA, et al. Results of long-term therapy with a biosimilar of eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Acta Haematol. Published online November 25, 2024. doi:10.1159/000542294
2. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Cleveland Clinic. Updated April 25, 2022. Accessed January 28, 2025. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22871-paroxysmal-nocturnal-hemoglobinuria
3. Dingli D, Maciejewski JP, Larratt L, et al. Relationship of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) granulocyte clone size to disease burden and risk of major vascular events in untreated patients: results from the International PNH Registry. Ann Hematol. 2023;102(7):1637-1644. doi:10.1007/s00277-023-05269-4
Biosimilar Teriparatide Matches Forteo in Safety and Fracture Risk
January 23rd 2025Biosimilar teriparatide has been shown to be as safe and effective as its reference product for osteoporosis treatment, potentially enabling significant cost savings in Japan’s health care system while addressing persistent misconceptions about biosimilar quality.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Equivalence Confirmed: CT-P41 Paves the Way for Affordable Osteoporosis Care
January 8th 2025Celltrion’s denosumab biosimilar demonstrated equivalent efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the originator in a phase 3 trial involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, paving the way for improved accessibility and cost savings in osteoporosis treatment.