A phase 1 study compared pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity between SB12, a proposed eculizumab biosimilar, and EU and US reference products (Soliris) in healthy adults.
A phase 1 study compared pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity between SB12, a proposed eculizumab biosimilar, and the European Union and United States reference products (Soliris) in healthy adults.
Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the terminal complement protein C5, inhibiting the complement pathway to reduce the risk of hemolysis and thrombosis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia gravis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
The study, published in the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, randomized 240 healthy subjects (95.8% male) to the biosimilar, reference product sourced from the United States, or reference product sourced from the EU. A single 300 mg dose of the study drug was delivered via intravenous infusion, and blood samples were taken multiple times throughout the following 64 days.
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Overall, pharmacokinetic parameters, including the primary PK endpoint (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUCinf]) and secondary PK endpoints were comparable between the 3 treatment groups. In comparisons between pairs of treatments, pharmacokinetic similarity was demonstrated, as the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares means ratios of the primary and secondary PK endpoints were within the predefined bioequivalence margins of 80-125%.
To evaluate pharmacodynamics, terminal complement activity over time was measured. The authors explained that terminal complement activity was selected as the PD endpoint “based on the correlation with clinical outcome and the understanding of mechanism of action (MOA) in PNH patients.” They reported that the PD profile of the proposed biosimilar “was similar to known eculizumab profiles,” and terminal complement activity over time was similar between the 3 treatment groups.
Safety and Immunogenicity
Most subjects (68.8%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 56 (70.0%) in the SB12 group, 52 (65.0%) in the EU reference product group, and 57 (71.3%) in the US reference product group. The proportions of TEAEs considered to be related to the study drugs were 31.3% in the biosimilar group, 21.3% in the EU reference product group, and 36.3% in the US reference product group.
The most frequent TEAE considered related to the study drug was headache. Infusion-related reactions, an AE of special interest, were reported by 7.5% of subjects in the SB12 group, 5.0% in the EU reference group, and 1.3% in the US reference group. Most adverse events were mild to moderate; 3 participants (one in each treatment group) experienced severe TEAEs, all of which were considered unrelated to the study drug.
The incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was comparable between groups, according to the authors. Following the infusion, ADAs were detected in 2.5%, 1.3%, and 0% of participants in the biosimilar, EU reference, and US reference groups. No neutralizing antibodies were detected in ADA-positive subjects.
The investigators concluded their results demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of SB12 to the EU and US eculizumab reference products based on EMA and FDA requirements. Furthermore, that safety and pharmacodynamic profiles were comparable between the treatment groups. They added that their findings “represent an important contribution to the totality of evidence for supporting the biosimilarity of SB12 to its reference drugs, following the demonstration of analytical and functional similarity in extensive quality and non-clinical results”
Reference
Lee HA, Jang H, Jeong D, Kim Y, Fuhr R. A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel group, single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic similarity between SB12 (a proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and eculizumab (Soliris) in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;60(6):269-279. doi:10.5414/CP204176.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Aflibercept Biosimilar MYL-1701P Provides Equivalence in DME Therapy
November 27th 2024The study findings demonstrate that the aflibercept biosimilar MYL-1701P is as effective and safe as the reference aflibercept in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), offering a promising option for reducing treatment costs and improving global access to care for patients with DME.
Ocrelizumab Biosimilar Shows Equivalent Efficacy as Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
November 26th 2024The phase 3 trial (NCT04966338) found that a biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) was equivalent to Ocrevus in reducing the annualized relapse rate and showed comparable safety and efficacy in treating relapsing multiple sclerosis over 96 weeks.