A phase 1 study compared pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity between SB12, a proposed eculizumab biosimilar, and EU and US reference products (Soliris) in healthy adults.
A phase 1 study compared pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity between SB12, a proposed eculizumab biosimilar, and the European Union and United States reference products (Soliris) in healthy adults.
Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the terminal complement protein C5, inhibiting the complement pathway to reduce the risk of hemolysis and thrombosis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, generalized myasthenia gravis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
The study, published in the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, randomized 240 healthy subjects (95.8% male) to the biosimilar, reference product sourced from the United States, or reference product sourced from the EU. A single 300 mg dose of the study drug was delivered via intravenous infusion, and blood samples were taken multiple times throughout the following 64 days.
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Overall, pharmacokinetic parameters, including the primary PK endpoint (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUCinf]) and secondary PK endpoints were comparable between the 3 treatment groups. In comparisons between pairs of treatments, pharmacokinetic similarity was demonstrated, as the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares means ratios of the primary and secondary PK endpoints were within the predefined bioequivalence margins of 80-125%.
To evaluate pharmacodynamics, terminal complement activity over time was measured. The authors explained that terminal complement activity was selected as the PD endpoint “based on the correlation with clinical outcome and the understanding of mechanism of action (MOA) in PNH patients.” They reported that the PD profile of the proposed biosimilar “was similar to known eculizumab profiles,” and terminal complement activity over time was similar between the 3 treatment groups.
Safety and Immunogenicity
Most subjects (68.8%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), 56 (70.0%) in the SB12 group, 52 (65.0%) in the EU reference product group, and 57 (71.3%) in the US reference product group. The proportions of TEAEs considered to be related to the study drugs were 31.3% in the biosimilar group, 21.3% in the EU reference product group, and 36.3% in the US reference product group.
The most frequent TEAE considered related to the study drug was headache. Infusion-related reactions, an AE of special interest, were reported by 7.5% of subjects in the SB12 group, 5.0% in the EU reference group, and 1.3% in the US reference group. Most adverse events were mild to moderate; 3 participants (one in each treatment group) experienced severe TEAEs, all of which were considered unrelated to the study drug.
The incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was comparable between groups, according to the authors. Following the infusion, ADAs were detected in 2.5%, 1.3%, and 0% of participants in the biosimilar, EU reference, and US reference groups. No neutralizing antibodies were detected in ADA-positive subjects.
The investigators concluded their results demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of SB12 to the EU and US eculizumab reference products based on EMA and FDA requirements. Furthermore, that safety and pharmacodynamic profiles were comparable between the treatment groups. They added that their findings “represent an important contribution to the totality of evidence for supporting the biosimilarity of SB12 to its reference drugs, following the demonstration of analytical and functional similarity in extensive quality and non-clinical results”
Reference
Lee HA, Jang H, Jeong D, Kim Y, Fuhr R. A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel group, single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic similarity between SB12 (a proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and eculizumab (Soliris) in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;60(6):269-279. doi:10.5414/CP204176.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.