Between reference infliximab and biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 (Inflectra, Remsima), different recommendations exist for the clinical solutions. Recently, a research article, published in BioDrugs, assessed and compared the stability of the solutions prepared from the originator and the biosimilar using a set of characterization methods in line with International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use recommendations.
Between reference infliximab and biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 (Inflectra, Remsima), different recommendations exist for the clinical solutions. Recently, a research article, published in BioDrugs, assessed and compared the stability of the solutions prepared from the originator and the biosimilar using a set of characterization methods in line with International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use recommendations.
The investigators used reconstituted solutions of the reference and the biosimilar, and dilutions were stored in glass vials (10 mg and 2 mg per mL) or in polyolefin infusion bags (0.4 mg per mL), and were subsequently refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C for 2 weeks.
The distribution of particulates was studied over a range of 0.001—1.0 µm by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Oligomers were analyzed by native size-exclusion ultra-high–performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (UV) visible detection coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS); MS was also used to evaluate natural aggregates and the isoform profile, and DLS was also used to detect gross conformational changes by tracking the hydrodynamic radius.
The secondary structure of the proteins was studied by far UV circular dichroism, while the tertiary structure was assessed by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. Reverse-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection was used to analyze intact reference and biosimilar infliximab for quantification.
Functionality was evaluated through biological activity as measured by the extension of the immunological reaction of the infliximab agents with tumor necrosis factor by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The authors write that the stress applied to both the reference and biosimilar solutions showed similar levels of aggregate formation, structural variation, and chemical modification. Only 1 notable difference emerged: in freeze-thaw cycles, CT-P13 was slightly more robust.
CT-P13 and the reference showed identical far UV circular dichroism spectra, which did not change over time. No significant changes were found in tertiary structure, and no aggregate process was noted during the period of the study. No meaningful differences emerged in the hydrodynamic radius of the solutions over time, and the concentration of infliximab in both products remained constant.
The 2 products have different glycosylation patterns, so differences in the native MS profile were found, which was expected. No important modifications developed over time.
The product’s function was maintained over the 60-day test period, and it was similar in all solutions tested.
The authors concluded that there were high levels of similarity between the reference and the biosimilar, and that when prepared and stored as normally used in the hospital pharmacy, all solutions showed physiochemical and functional stability.
Reference
Hermosilla J, Sánchez-Martín R, Pérez-Robles R, et al. Comparative stability studies of different infliximab and biosimilar CT-P13 clinical solutions by combined use of physiochemical analytical techniques and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). BioDrugs. 2019;33(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00342-9.
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Calling for Unified Biosimilar Standards, Stronger Education at GRx+Biosims
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, a fireside chat highlighted the need to streamline biosimilar development and strengthen industry collaboration, with Sarah Yim, MD, of the FDA, emphasizing education's key role in building trust and adoption.
Unifying Standards: The Need for Streamlined Biosimilar Development
October 22nd 2024At the 2024 GRx+Biosims conference, industry leaders and regulatory experts underscored the urgency of unifying global standards and simplifying the biosimilar development process, sharing insights on recent advancements and the necessity for greater collaboration between manufacturers and regulatory agencies.