Between reference infliximab and biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 (Inflectra, Remsima), different recommendations exist for the clinical solutions. Recently, a research article, published in BioDrugs, assessed and compared the stability of the solutions prepared from the originator and the biosimilar using a set of characterization methods in line with International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use recommendations.
Between reference infliximab and biosimilar infliximab CT-P13 (Inflectra, Remsima), different recommendations exist for the clinical solutions. Recently, a research article, published in BioDrugs, assessed and compared the stability of the solutions prepared from the originator and the biosimilar using a set of characterization methods in line with International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use recommendations.
The investigators used reconstituted solutions of the reference and the biosimilar, and dilutions were stored in glass vials (10 mg and 2 mg per mL) or in polyolefin infusion bags (0.4 mg per mL), and were subsequently refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C for 2 weeks.
The distribution of particulates was studied over a range of 0.001—1.0 µm by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Oligomers were analyzed by native size-exclusion ultra-high–performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (UV) visible detection coupled to native mass spectrometry (MS); MS was also used to evaluate natural aggregates and the isoform profile, and DLS was also used to detect gross conformational changes by tracking the hydrodynamic radius.
The secondary structure of the proteins was studied by far UV circular dichroism, while the tertiary structure was assessed by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. Reverse-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection was used to analyze intact reference and biosimilar infliximab for quantification.
Functionality was evaluated through biological activity as measured by the extension of the immunological reaction of the infliximab agents with tumor necrosis factor by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The authors write that the stress applied to both the reference and biosimilar solutions showed similar levels of aggregate formation, structural variation, and chemical modification. Only 1 notable difference emerged: in freeze-thaw cycles, CT-P13 was slightly more robust.
CT-P13 and the reference showed identical far UV circular dichroism spectra, which did not change over time. No significant changes were found in tertiary structure, and no aggregate process was noted during the period of the study. No meaningful differences emerged in the hydrodynamic radius of the solutions over time, and the concentration of infliximab in both products remained constant.
The 2 products have different glycosylation patterns, so differences in the native MS profile were found, which was expected. No important modifications developed over time.
The product’s function was maintained over the 60-day test period, and it was similar in all solutions tested.
The authors concluded that there were high levels of similarity between the reference and the biosimilar, and that when prepared and stored as normally used in the hospital pharmacy, all solutions showed physiochemical and functional stability.
Reference
Hermosilla J, Sánchez-Martín R, Pérez-Robles R, et al. Comparative stability studies of different infliximab and biosimilar CT-P13 clinical solutions by combined use of physiochemical analytical techniques and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). BioDrugs. 2019;33(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00342-9.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.