A phase 1 study in China found that pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the liraglutide biosimilar RD12014 and the reference product (Victoza) in healthy male participants.
A phase 1 study in China found that pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the liraglutide biosimilar RD12014 (Sunshine Lake Pharma) and the reference product (Victoza) in healthy male participants. The authors used their findings to support a new drug application in China, which does not currently have a liraglutide biosimilar on the market.
Liraglutide is used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D), which accounts for more than 90% of diabetes cases. The authors said that the prevalence of the disease is increasing and noted the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, blindness, kidney disease, and other conditions associated with T2D. Because traditional anti-diabetic drugs, such as insulin and sulfonylureas, may cause hypoglycemia, they wrote, “it is necessary to develop new drugs of new mechanisms” to effectively control blood glucose and reduce the risk of complications.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), according to the authors, reduces blood glucose levels, suppresses glucagon secretion, protects pancreatic beta-cells, slows gastric emptying, and helps reduce body weight. However, since GLP-1 has a short half-life, liraglutide was developed as a longer half-life GLP-1 analog.
The reference product is currently used as a subcutaneous injection to treat T2D. It was approved as an adjunct therapy to diet and exercise for T2D by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2009 and by the FDA in 2010. The reference product was also approved to prevent cardiovascular events in adults with T2D by the FDA in 2017 and by China in 2020.
The investigators said that several biosimilars referencing Victoza are in clinical trials, but there are no liraglutide biosimilars currently on the market in China. Their study evaluated pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the liraglutide biosimilar candidate RD12014 in 49 healthy male participants. The primary PK endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0−last). Subjects received a single dose of either the biosimilar or reference product, followed by a seven-day washout period, and then a single dose of the other biologic.
PK Equivalence Was Demonstrated Between RD12014 and Victoza
The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax (90% CI, 106-118) and AUC0-last (90% CI, 107-117) for the biosimilar and reference product were within the equivalence range of 80% to 125%.
Overall, the safety profiles of the 2 biologics were similar, the authors said, with 14 adverse events (AEs) occurring in 11 subjects (22%) in the biosimilar group and 19 AEs in 16 subjects (33%) in the reference product group. Thirteen AEs in the biosimilar group and 12 in the reference product group were considered treatment related. All AEs were mild and were resolved without medical intervention by the end of the study. The most common treatment-related AEs were an increase in serum uric acid (12%), and an increase in blood bilirubin (10%), with comparable incidence in the 2 groups. The authors added that there were no major hypoglycemic episodes during the trial, indicating that GLP-1 analogs “reduce blood glucose in a glucose-dependent mode and may even reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.”
Regarding immunogenicity, blood samples from all 49 subjects were negative for anti-drug antibodies, before and after receiving the study drugs.
The investigators concluded their study demonstrated PK similarity of RD12014 to the reference product, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles, and added that their findings were used to support a new drug application in China.
Reference
Zhou R, Guo L, Gao X, et al. A phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of the biosimilar (RD12014) with liraglutide (Victoza) in healthy Chinese male subjects. Clin Transl Sci. 2022;15(10):2458-2467. doi:10.1111/cts.13374
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.